Anfield vs Tutortime??? - 國際學校

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

我的中心

教育王國 › 討論區 › 國際學校 › Anfield vs Tutortime???

查看: 1242\|回覆: 9	go Anfield vs Tutortime??? [複製鏈接]

Koeda

別墅

Rank: 4


	537

1^#

發表於 13-11-13 00:06 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印

Why people all choose anfield not Tutortime?
Isn't Tutortime has more Chinese than anfield?
Which school has better academic record?

1 0 0 0

返回頂部

G-girl

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	390

2^#

發表於 13-11-13 00:33 |只看該作者

回覆：Koeda 的帖子

I think many people choose Anfield over Tutor Time because Anfield has primary school for back up.

返回頂部

Mrslot

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1497

3^#

發表於 13-11-13 09:10 |只看該作者

引用：I+think+many+people+choose+Anfield+over+

原帖由 G-girl 於 13-11-13 發表
I think many people choose Anfield over Tutor Time because Anfield has primary school for back up.

...

Agree, if not, tt would surely be a better choice

返回頂部

minirat

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	6157

4^#

發表於 13-11-13 09:39 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 minirat 於 13-11-13 09:40 編輯

Mrslot 發表於 13-11-13 09:10
Agree, if not, tt would surely be a better choice

Did you have experiences with both Anfield and TT? Few parents I know whose kids attended both prefer Anfield over TT, not due to primary school backup. Anyway Anfield kindergarten students do not have direct entry to Anfield Primary.

返回頂部

Mrslot

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1497

5^#

發表於 13-11-13 09:45 |只看該作者

引用：+本帖最後由+minirat+於+13-11-13+09:40+編

原帖由 minirat 於 13-11-13 發表
本帖最後由 minirat 於 13-11-13 09:40 編輯

No but Chinese learning is much better in tt.
Although there is no guarantee of a place in primary, k students have some sort of priority? many ppl feel more safe with this arrangement maybe.

返回頂部

Koeda

別墅

Rank: 4


	537

6^#

發表於 13-11-13 09:52 |只看該作者

回覆：minirat 的帖子

Oh really?! They attend both school's playgroup or nursery class? Can u advise some details why Anfield is better. In deed, I think Anfield kids are more discipline than tt but surely the Chinese standard is higher than Anfield..'

返回頂部

minirat

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	6157

7^#

發表於 13-11-13 10:04 |只看該作者

Koeda 發表於 13-11-13 09:52
Oh really?! They attend both school's playgroup or nursery class? Can u advise some details why An ...

Sorry, I am not saying Anfield is better but that was what I understand from parents who attended both before. My boy never attended TT, so I cannot comment. It is true that Anfield is an international kindergarten with disciplines. In terms of Mandarin exposure, there is only 30mins per day indeed but my boy can sing few Mandarin songs and utter few Mandarin words after attending Nursery for 2 months. This is good enough for me. Let's put it this way. It is the same 3 hours per day for each school. It is just different proportions of Mandarin and English. I seriously do not think it will make a great deal of difference in result. If it does, it is the teaching approaches. I have no question on Anfield in this aspect.

返回頂部

hubbyhubby

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1194

8^#

發表於 13-11-13 22:34 |只看該作者

My boy is studying pg in TT (Suffolk campus), I quite like the school, majority of the teachers there r quite gd, only one or two of them r bad.... U may search more info in EK regarding TT pg