關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 DGJS and St. Paul Co-ed 喜歡收哪類型的學生?
查看: 5768|回覆: 26
go

DGJS and St. Paul Co-ed 喜歡收哪類型的學生? [複製鏈接]


1138
1#
發表於 12-10-5 09:09 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
   3    0    0    0

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2299
2#
發表於 12-10-5 10:03 |只看該作者
Let me share what I know.  Maybe not true, just gather all of the voices personally.

DGJS - smart, bright with confidence.  Parts of them are with good family background, parts of them are stronge in academic.

St Paul Co-ed - good family background.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2644
3#
發表於 12-10-5 13:40 |只看該作者
What is "good family background"?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6928
4#
發表於 12-10-5 14:05 |只看該作者
回復 eyschoi 的帖子

我有個朋友個仔而家讀緊st paul co-ed, 佢個仔好叻仔, 富好奇心, 18般武藝, 對新事物唔抗拒, 聽聞成績都好好, 年尾有得上台領獎果隻。
我朋友兩公婆都係律師, 算唔算good family backgrd 就大家自己解讀喇, 但肯定o既係佢地都好栽培阿仔~

Rank: 3Rank: 3


416
5#
發表於 12-10-5 18:10 |只看該作者
我朋友兒子是st Paul co-ed 學生,他只是一個普通小孩,並無個人獨突之處,但他爸爸是上巿公司主席

點評

chunsamyuen  上巿公司主席=good family background  發表於 12-10-6 10:41

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1303
6#
發表於 12-10-5 18:24 |只看該作者
I think both school loves kids who are smart, bright with confidence  except DGJS prefers girls only while SPCCPS likes both boys and girls. Both school have kids with good family background and some of them are stronge in academic.
Actually, if you have a second child who is a boy, choosing SPCCPS may be a better move. But it never gurantee the second child can get a place in future.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1690
7#
發表於 12-10-5 18:48 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 interview 於 12-10-5 18:51 編輯

正常每間學校都有個mix的唔會只收一類,差在多與少,點可以pin point一個因素?

有些有人事/社會地位
有些有特殊技能
有些純粹人見人愛,受教又醒目型

有晒以上因素當然最好,但都要看臨門一腳interview表現

就算有人事/社會地位的人,都不會鬆懈而唔培養個小朋友,所以小朋友本身實力唔會太差

不過理論上,DGJS非人事位(舊生/弟妹)會多些,因為是女校。有社會地位的人,就兩間都會報。

點評

DiamondHill  沒有既定答案的, 只是大既而已.  不能忽略既當然是運氣.  發表於 12-10-5 19:15


1809
8#
發表於 12-10-5 22:02 |只看該作者

回覆:interview 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1303
9#
發表於 12-10-6 18:08 |只看該作者
SPCCPS is also very famous for preferring full time mum though there are a lot of working mum with kids accepted. I think all these school prefers full time mum. They usually come from a better off family as only one father can support the family. Full time mum are suppose to have more time taking care of their kids. Also there is a high chance for full time mum to participate as voluntary work in school. However at the end of the day, I think the performance of the child is the single most important factor.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6266
10#
發表於 12-10-6 20:08 |只看該作者
有小朋友讀dgjs,唔係ftm都會變成FTm.
有朋友本身係麻醉科醫生,2個女入左去佢都轉做FTm!

點評

tumtum  Can't agree more  發表於 12-10-8 17:27
picture  ha ha ha  very true.   If parents don't care about their kids they won't send them to DG and once they're in, you are bound to put in your full effort.  發表於 12-10-7 22:36

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1690
11#
發表於 12-10-7 00:35 |只看該作者
有很多因素,包括是否家底好,FTM,都是不能改變的,無謂深究。可以控制的只有怎樣培育小朋友。。其餘是眼緣

我小朋友都是coed 學生,我是working mom,中產沒關係一族。當然唔敢講我小朋友好叻,只是有運氣吧。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2014
12#
發表於 12-10-7 21:18 |只看該作者
兩間都鐘意bright and smart的小朋友,不過base on身邊朋友的仔女,好似co-ed都會收D文靜/學術出眾的小朋友,比dgjs更著重family background, dg就prefer小朋友有佢學校一貫的personality.

Rank: 4


608
13#
發表於 12-10-7 22:08 |只看該作者
小朋友不用去刻意迎合學校, 太強求不一定好。而且現在都已過1ST round, 已成定局。順其自然, 平日係點就點, 小朋友都掩蓋唔到多少本性, 自然點可能更好。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


498
14#
發表於 12-10-7 23:41 |只看該作者

回覆:interview 的帖子

I agreed with interview, I myself working mom and my son also accepted by co ed. Also lucky only but I think all depending on how you spend the time with your kid. And how much you want to be involved with the school.



Rank: 5Rank: 5


2644
15#
發表於 12-10-8 08:28 |只看該作者
Definitely there are lots of factors a school will consider.  Personally, I don't think full time mom has high weight as I know quite a lot of working moms in these schools.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


347
16#
發表於 12-10-8 12:34 |只看該作者
聽說Co ed不收細仔細女,是真的嗎?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1303
17#
發表於 12-10-8 17:18 |只看該作者
回復 happymum1 的帖子

That's another rumour just like the FTM. There are a lot of 細仔 in the school. However, since the kids is only five years old during the interview, a few months older do really have some advantage.. I think the principal has already answered this question in the 簡介會 every year.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1740
18#
發表於 12-10-8 17:26 |只看該作者
I think another difference between the 2 schools is that Co-ed openly tells you that they will reserve up to 70% of the P.1 seats for kids with relationship with the school.   

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1690
19#
發表於 12-10-8 18:04 |只看該作者
Coed:

我估以前會多D細仔,這兩年好少,要轉做超大

夠錢我都想做FTM啊。。

另外其實那個70% limit,係not more than,唔係要reserve70%。

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6266
20#
發表於 12-10-8 18:45 |只看該作者
interview 發表於 12-10-8 18:04
Coed:

我估以前會多D細仔,這兩年好少,要轉做超大
但估計果70%都會用盡吧!
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖