- 在線時間
- 114 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-7-30
- 國民生產力
- 4
- 附加生產力
- 2
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-12-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 379
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 385
- UID
- 171442
 
|
Pianokc,
The parent orientation you went was probably a long time ago. Yes, it was a confirmed "fail" earlier this year.
I think IBO has strict criteria regarding the langauge a school uses. You need to have (or choose) one language to be a "first language" within the school.
If you look at the language environment in the IB schools in Hong Kong, you will note that all of them have chosen English to be the main language of use. Of course, an IB school does not have to be necessarily an English school, but the essense is that, there must be one main language that is used throughout the school.
ISF have designed their own language model that move from Chinese to English, ie 70% Chinese in primary and gradually moving to 70% English in secondary, hoping that their students can be good at both.
I do not want to discuss whether this kind of "ideal" model is going to work but this kind of model definitely does not meet the criteria of IBO.
Whether IB approval can be obtained may be really no big deal, since I am sure there must be other better curriculum. And I am sure many parents do not care about this anyway.
But what I am surprised is that, if the school has always been so keen on the IB curriculum (being an IB school candidate was indeed one of their marketing points, and they used to speak highly of IB curriculum to parents), then with the money and brains they have, why the ISF management has not hired the right and qualified person to bring the school on the right track of getting IB approval.
If they have done their due diligence, and are still keen on keeping their own language model, they probably would not have to waste all the money and time used to go through the process of applying for IB approval.
[ 本帖最後由 almom 於 09-5-27 13:59 編輯 ] |
|