培僑書院VS蔡繼有

Rank: 2


	60

1^#

發表於 05-11-9 12:15 |只看該作者

本人的女兒已被培僑取錄,在培僑取錄之前又到蔡繼有面試,現想咨詢大家的意見,在這兩間學校,各位將如何取捨.謝謝!

cmama

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1365

2^#

發表於 05-11-9 13:11 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

Congratulations for being accepted by pui kiu.
My daughter failed unfortunately.
Both school seems to have similar curriculum.
If financially is not a problem and both school are not too far away from home, I would prefer CKY cos Po Leung Kuk is more established and the system and curriculum would be more stable than Pui Kiu. There would be more unforeseeable stuff in Pui Kiu.

bowling68

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1963

3^#

發表於 05-11-9 16:28 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

but if 培僑 accepted your kid, then you have to give up all the other chances including lucky draw, am I right ?

for me, sure CKY, though 培僑 has primary and secondary school together.

honeybbb

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1027

4^#

發表於 05-11-9 16:48 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

一定cky, pui kiu 政策比較混亂, cky係plk辦有一定經驗, 陳守仁係一個好例子, 至於pui kiu真係有所保留, 所以學費都要比人平一大截

father_ho

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	263

5^#

發表於 05-11-9 16:50 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

My kid also applied both school since they are really similar in designing the study path and approach. In my view, of course CKY if both of them admit my kid (Pui Kiu admitted) since CKY had already a record of teaching to my son and I am very satisfy with the progress. I apply PK is just as a backup since I feel this year has lots of parent apply for CKY and I am not sure my younger kid can follow or not. Although PK's fee is much much less than CKY, but through the discussion with PK's teacher and principal seems they may not go for IB because they feel too expensive to go for it. It seem they leave it open and let parent to decide on it in future but it will mean that if you select it now, it may have the risk either other parent cannot afford it(very likely to increase school fee) or they select some class to go for it and it will create unnecessary discrimination. But if you decide to leave PK in the future, it may not easy for you to find another school of similar approach and has vacancy for not very brilliant student. That's my view, please consider.

swwm

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	239

6^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:06 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

honeybbb 寫道:
一定cky, pui kiu 政策比較混亂, cky係plk辦有一定經驗, 陳守仁係一個好例子, 至於pui kiu真係有所保留, 所以學費都要比人平一大截

原來學費平的學校就是不好的

kris313

Rank: 2


	66

7^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:08 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

你們都說:培僑和蔡繼有的教學理念和方法很相似，其實即是怎樣，可否簡單說明？
如跟浸小比較，有甚麼分別？

angelinama

Rank: 2


	60

8^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:17 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

我有一點不同意你的說法,無可否認蔡繼有在行政上是比培僑好,畢竟培僑始終是一間新校,很多的東西都有待改善.但它亦有強大的中資背景支持,我個人覺得它一係不辦,一旦辦起來就會做得有聲有色,培僑中學就是一個好例子.對嗎?

father_ho

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	263

9^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:28 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

That is they all emphasis on using mandarin and english plus other language, they will go for IBD, small class, theme learning, adopt imported books which not emphasis on mechanic work (I just visit a bookstore/agent mainly for teachers to select which impressed me much since those books are very good but expensive but cheaper than those popular bookshop), not much homework but encourage you(parent) to read with your kids and let your kid enjoy reading.
Sorry that I can't compare 浸小 since they offer too little information to potential parent, may be they still not yet start. Even don't know what kind of books they will adopt (Pui Kui using backpack series which I feel it is a good one, you can search through internet). Thanks

KerryHau

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	181

10^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:37 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

請問蔡繼有面試, 考什麼呀, 我個小朋友今個星期六考.....

angelinama 寫道:
本人的女兒已被培僑取錄,在培僑取錄之前又到蔡繼有面試,現想咨詢大家的意見,在這兩間學校,各位將如何取捨.謝謝!

kris313

Rank: 2


	66

11^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:44 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

many thanks to father-ho
your intro is so detailed
in fact my daughter is studying in BU kindergarten, it seems to be much similar teaching approach with these schools
so far i'm quite satisfied with BU although it is a new school, everything's in good progress. most importantly, the children feel interested and happy in school life. the teaching method do stimulate learning interest, creativity, independence and participation.

Wnnieng

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2522

12^#

發表於 05-11-9 17:57 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

I will choose CKY. For sure to go for IB, have much confident on this school and without political background.
CKY has more English and PK has more Mandarin.

father_ho

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	263

13^#

發表於 05-11-9 18:02 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

Dear parent,
Please don't put too much pressure to your kids. Actually, my kid already interviewed by several schools and most of them will separate the parent with the child and let the teacher observe their standard in performing certain task (different school has different approach) in order to eliminate the effect of preparation by parent. Just one reminder, All the pressure can just feel by us as parent, try your best to let your kid be in a good mood is enough.

Pulmma

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1015

14^#

發表於 05-11-9 18:12 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

honeybbb 寫道:
一定cky, pui kiu 政策比較混亂, cky係plk辦有一定經驗, 陳守仁係一個好例子, 至於pui kiu真係有所保留, 所以學費都要比人平一大截

你覺得pkc政策混亂???? 何以見得呢??? 我覺得ok喎! 學校好開明, 老師資歷很勁, 很有愛心, 班主任定期都有打電話給家長說說小朋友在學校的學習情況. 開學至今, 老師已有2次打給我說小女在校的進度. 我覺得很好. 國語有驚人的進步. 還有學校的WEB可以比家長提出問題, 老師及校長都很快回答. 還有義工家長幫手, 學校一D都唔怕比家長完全透視學校的情況喎!

cky 是一間好的學校. 英文情度很高, 我有2個親友的小朋友分別讀2年及4年級. 家長都很滿意, 唯獨小朋友的紀律有好大問題, 或者cky 是偏向國際模式教多些, 加上多鬼仔鬼妹, 難免會比較活躍一些.

至於辦學經驗, PKL無疑是經驗豐富, 但PKC都唔弱的, 唔好忘記PKC都是培僑小學及中學辦了很多年學的機構, 而PKC今年都從培僑中學及小學抽了一些有豐富辦學經驗的老師及工作人員到PKC, 以我的經驗就覺得冇問題喎!!!!

PULMMA

cosom

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	179

15^#

發表於 05-11-9 23:36 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

Dear Pulmma,

Why do you say: CKY小朋友的紀律有好大問題 ?
Do you meet all CKY 小朋友 at school?

BTW, is it all PKC 小朋友的紀律 is very well?

Pulmma 寫道:

cky 是一間好的學校. 英文情度很高, 我有2個親友的小朋友分別讀2年及4年級. 家長都很滿意, 唯獨小朋友的紀律有好大問題, 或者cky 是偏向國際模式教多些, 加上多鬼仔鬼妹, 難免會比較活躍一些.

PULMMA

Aimee

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	208

16^#

發表於 05-11-10 09:10 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

其實兩間都是好學校，各有唔同的特點，主要看那間最配合孩子和自己。
蔡繼友注重以班主任教授本班大部分的課程，再加上跨學科課程的實施，教師可因應教學的需要作出調校。而除中文科外，全以英語教授。
培僑則注重專科專教，下午的活動亦會外聘專科老師教授，不另收費。
以下是小學概覽，培僑師資的資料:
學歷：認可教育文憑93%，大學學位100%，特殊教育培訓0%
年資：0-4年66%，5-9年17%，10年以上17%，另有社工一星期有四天駐校。
而培僑小學部，中文及數學科會以普通話教授，中學部則以英語為主，我認為較適合我囡囡這類，以廣東話為母語的學生。
以下是另一網站中，有關培僑的分享，可作參考。http://www.hk-farm.com/discuss/read.php?f=6&i=12851&t=12851&c=30&dc=2

Honeybbb,
至於學校政策，我到現階段都很滿意。是否因學校面試的安排，而對校政不滿？我觀看這類親子教育網站已有5年以上，主要是想多些了解這類新教育理念的直資/私校，為孩子選校。每年面試前後都特別多家長討論，差不多每一間新校的面試形式都被人批評過，而就你所認為校政好的學校，前一兩年，又何嘗不被人批評過，只是你可能沒有留意吧了。

kunggi201

別墅

Rank: 4


	571

17^#

發表於 05-11-10 11:26 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

一般傳統學校是要學生乖乖坐定
唔準講野，留心聽老師教書

CKY 是用活動教學
每天早上集會不是聽校長訓話
而是成班學生一齊跳健身舞
上課時是大家一起參與
可以在課室內跑、叫、跳、唱歌
（We can jump, we can shout, we can sing…）
所以孩子們是比較「活躍」,但又不致於說沒有紀律
不過，對於一些傳統家長，未必接受得了
可以去去CKY校網睇相片，見見孩子們如何古靈精怪

有一年參加Class Observation
家長們見到成班學生上課，像一群猴子
家長們都說：「嘩，好驚呀！」
但是，他們是用笑笑的口吻說出來
可見，他們是接受CKY的教育模式
如果唔接受，又點會每個月交近4000大洋的學費丫

我和大部份CKY家長一樣，
是寧要一個曳曳仔，也不要一個薯仔
如果不是太過份，就由他發揮創意吧！

P.S.
認識一個小朋友，是孩子幼稚園同學
本來是很精靈，但入了某傳統名校一年後
在功課壓力下，每天早上見他都是呆下呆下
和我孩子「連行路都好似跳咁」成一個對比
想要孩子的發展如何，是沒有準則
由家長決定吧！

honeybbb

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1027

18^#

發表於 05-11-10 12:22 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

swwm
請勿誤會!!我意思唔係學費比人平就唔好，而係直資學校收既學費應該會直接用返教學上，收得較平自然較難好似cky咁提供IB課程!!

swwm 寫道:
[quote]
honeybbb 寫道:
一定cky, pui kiu 政策比較混亂, cky係plk辦有一定經驗, 陳守仁係一個好例子, 至於pui kiu真係有所保留, 所以學費都要比人平一大截

原來學費平的學校就是不好的

[/quote]

honeybbb

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1027

19^#

發表於 05-11-10 12:28 |只看該作者

Re: 培僑書院VS蔡繼有

Pulmma
我覺得PKC行政混亂, 係由佢個無清楚講明是否需要2ND INTERVIEW, 然後再一部份DIRECT ADMIT, 一部份2ND INTERVIEW, 亦無在網上公佈幾時會 2ND IN, 大部份家長都係自己致電PKC OR 在BK TOPIC 先知原來可以BEFORE 7/11 就可以致電問PKC 個RESULT, 就算新校, 其實係咪可以在自己WED SITE 到公佈呢? 辦學經驗又有咁豐富, 但行政經驗缺乏

BTW, PKC 如果做到佢地所講既辦學理念的確係唔錯既!

Pulmma 寫道:
[quote]
honeybbb 寫道:
一定cky, pui kiu 政策比較混亂, cky係plk辦有一定經驗, 陳守仁係一個好例子, 至於pui kiu真係有所保留, 所以學費都要比人平一大截

EdT