RC VS clear water bay school 請問各位會點選擇呢 - 國際學校

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

我的中心

教育王國 › 討論區 › 國際學校 › RC VS clear water bay school 請問各位會點選擇呢 ...

12 3 下一頁

查看: 9093\|回覆: 59	go RC VS clear water bay school 請問各位會點選擇呢 [複製鏈接]

Bearlulie

洋房

Rank: 2


	66

1^#

發表於 13-3-13 14:50 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印

2 0 0 0

返回頂部

Bearlulie

洋房

Rank: 2


	66

2^#

發表於 13-3-13 15:50 |只看該作者

請各位指教一下會點揀。RC 己經比咗60k 留位。但今日收到clear water bay 電話話收。請問各位應該點呢。
心急人

返回頂部

meimei223

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2123

3^#

發表於 13-3-13 16:22 |只看該作者

Which one is closer to you? RC is teaching traditional Chinese & run IB, as I hear from a parent who gave up Shatin jonior & accepted RC's offer because of STJ teaching simplified Chinese & not running IB at the primary stage. Correct me if I am wrong.

返回頂部

sschiu

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1065

4^#

發表於 13-3-13 17:02 |只看該作者

All ESF primary schools are running IB's Primary Years Programme already.

However, RC runs IB's MYP in secondary but not ESF schools. At Years 12 & 13, all RC and ESF schools run the IB Diploma programme. Hope it is clear!

返回頂部

Bearlulie

洋房

Rank: 2


	66

5^#

發表於 13-3-13 18:10 |只看該作者

唔該唒呀

cwb 會近小小。我係一個蠢媽媽。英文又唔好其實我都未真係好清楚IB 所以睇下有乜意見。thxxx 二位

返回頂部

luckyveronique

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	4015

6^#

發表於 13-3-13 18:55 |只看該作者

回復 Bearlulie 的帖子

你已經好勁了，train到個仔有兩個好好既offer，我都發左夢兩年后能夠考入RC or SJS

返回頂部

Annie123

禁止訪問


	3367

7^#

發表於 13-3-13 19:15 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

FennieMan

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1369

8^#

發表於 13-3-13 19:30 |只看該作者

回覆：RC VS clear water bay school 請問各位會點選擇呢

比我會揀cwb,因近屋企

返回頂部

Ocean419

大宅

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	3109

9^#

發表於 13-3-13 22:35 |只看該作者

回覆：RC VS clear water bay school 請問各位會點選擇呢

我會揀rc因為我著重中文，cwb西人比例高中文學習環境相對差。

返回頂部

ABDADDY

洋房

Rank: 2


	55

10^#

發表於 13-3-14 00:07 |只看該作者

回覆：Bearlulie 的帖子

CWB because of KGV

返回頂部

angela11

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	238

11^#

發表於 13-3-14 01:07 |只看該作者

It depends on what you want for your child. I am sure you have many factors to consider: location, tuition fee, curricula (English and Chinese), student mix... Any factors that you weigh higher than others? Location is important esp. for young children. If both locations are manageable, personally I would choose RC because its Chinese is stronger (but it's just my preference).

返回頂部

Bearlulie

洋房

Rank: 2


	66

12^#

發表於 13-3-14 02:43 |只看該作者

明白呀。多謝你哋意見兩樣間學校各有強弱但我已經比咗成60k RC 留位。好似好浪費。

點評

FattyDaddy Since you mentioned the 60k twice in 2 separate posts, you may have already decided even before you asked {:1_1:} 發表於 13-3-14 03:33

返回頂部

hhy2007

別墅

Rank: 4


	571

13^#

發表於 13-3-14 10:47 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 hhy2007 於 13-3-14 14:41 編輯

Money doesn't have to be a concern here. The tuition fee at CWB is cheaper than RC by around HK$10,000 a year. If your child spends the primary at CWB, the tuition fee that you save may just trade off the HK$ 60,000 that you forego now. So I think you'd better give more weight on: (1) commute time from home to school; (2) options for future secondary school; and (2) Chinese program. RC has no catchment zone requirement. If your child is able to do well in CWB, he/she will have a higher chance to get into RC secondary school, but it's not so easy for a RC primary graduate to secure a seat in other ESF secondary schools due to ESF's priority system.