- 在線時間
- 56 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-11-2
- 國民生產力
- 47
- 附加生產力
- 407
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-7-16
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 267
- 主題
- 45
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 721
- UID
- 147985
|
Depend on how you define what is stressful and depend on your child's characteristics and you as a parent's education style.
TSL: I do'nt think TSL is activity based teaching. It's really traditional teaching format, including traditional curriculum and teaching styles, especially starting from P.4, they are really pushing, same as traditional schools. e,g, in P1-P3, the child can finish homework on average time of 30m to 45m. P.4. more than 2 hours sometimes, especially when there is compositions or creative writings.
The dictations in P4 is very long and much more difficult than before, need your full attention and concentration to work with the child on it.
If you want an activity based curriculum, CKY, creative primary school are the best curriculum design with well-trained teachers to carry out the philosophy of these kind of teaching. TSL teachers are not well-trained to carry out interactive teaching. They are good at traditional teaching.
The school emphasis on multicultralism, but in these 4 years of learning, I cannot see how the teachers trying to convey this kind of values to the kids or to the parents. They have this values, but not really well-trained to carry it out because they are not really well-trained on this area.
Despite of these limitations, I still see this a good school as the teachers are responsible, the school administration is well planned and well trained to be accountable to students and to parents. They have good foundations for education, but no surprise, but still worth to send children to come here!!
原帖由 jojo1234 於 11-6-24 12:23 發表 
我亦要從這兩間學校2選1,sfa我認識多點,這學校給我相當大壓力,但相信跟小兒幼稚園的教授方法相似.反而tsl我不太清楚,正在收資料. |
|
發表於 11-6-23 20:26
