- 在線時間
- 4 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-10-3
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 101
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-2-11
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 69
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 170
- UID
- 870415
 
|
引用：What+I+observe+based+on+the+2+students,+
本帖最後由 Maoku 於 12-12-22 22:44 編輯
原帖由 yzhui 於 12-12-21 發表
What I observe based on the 2 students, i may be biased too. Just I think there are also diff bandin ...
Perhaps a few points we should be mindful when making the so called "comparison" and facts should be evidenced rather than just personal perception.
1. More foreigners do not mean better learning environment. Likewise, having famous people like artists means nothing. Having student lives on HK island is also senseless comparison. Top IB schools like LPC is not located on the Island side either.
2. Having more students with tutor means what? Should we encourage student to learn independently for being a responsible inquirer as IB advocates?
3. RC is part of the ESF system. The only difference is that it receives no recurrent subsidy from the government. In fact, government will stop giving subsidy to new students in subsidized ESF schools starting 2013. Eventually, all will become non-subsidized PIS.
4. On 2012 IBDP results, CDNIS have 53% of cohorts reaching 35 point and above while RC is 50%. Mean grade score is 5.2 out of 7 while CDNIS is 5.6 which is comparable to SC or KGV under the ESF system.
5. Having said that, it is notably that RC academic score is coming up year by year and the recent batches of cohorts come from other schools. It will take a few years more to see the performance of those intake brought up staring from Year 1.
All in all, I doubt very much your arguments on RC as being "so so" in student and parent mix, teaching method, and teachers' quality which is unfair to the RC community.
Be a responsible person, I am not saying CDNIS is not a good school because I can by no means have the first hand experience in both schools, so not in a position to compare which is better.
 |
|
發表於 12-12-6 00:08
