學樂器好還是學繪畫好？兩者能否比較？ [複製鏈接]

Learning music is expensive but learning art is not any cheaper at all.  Some art school charges $200+ for an hr and the art material is also expensive.

看似學畫比較經濟，但如果畫油畫或水彩畫都唔平,水彩畫紙都幾貴，當然相比學鋼琴平

但學琴將來可以教鋼琴，都幾好賺,長遠投資

呀女好動，游水，跳舞，體操，溜冰，Hockey, 樣椂想玩，就係唔打羽毛球！激死！

原帖由 eviepa 於 10-6-29 00:03 發表


Yanamami,

我不知是否價錢越貴，質素越好。不過，我囡囡現在上畫班，一舊水一個鐘，質素亦不錯。

Material: 三年裡，學鉛筆素描時，買過十來支鉛筆，兩本畫薄。學水彩畫時買過一盒水彩、兩支畫筆、一個調色盒。現在學塑膠彩，買 ...

Really?  May I know where is your daughter's painting class?  My younger one likes to draw.

There are many students here in Hong kong learning piano, but how many really enjoy it?  I guess it is less than half.  Whatever learning instrument or painting, if the kid does not have an interest in it, he/ she will not doing it well.

I enrolled my son to painting class since K2, but his painting skill is extremely poor because he does not like it.  I sent him to learn piano since K1.  He is not playing it well but he likes it, so he keeps playing it and really enjoying it.  I think (or hope) he will be playing it well one day.

原帖由 eviepa 於 10-6-29 21:29 發表


Yanamami,

今次我連價錢都列出了，再給妳畫班的聯絡資料的話，就有兜售畫班之嫌，很可能已經犯了版規，所以幾經考慮之下決定不給妳，望能見諒。我不知道是否我囡囡的是超值，但很可能也有一間又相宜又好的畫室在妳家附近。

e ...

原帖由 wunma 於 10-6-29 15:52 發表
主要原因我作了一個假設, 是因為孩子太早學樂器. 如能不為功利去學, 我覺得最好是小五以上, 甚或中學後才學, 會更易上手, 更自發練習, 更快玩到簡單的樂曲而越有興趣繼續學上去.

壞處:
嘈到別人

原帖由 Yanamami 於 10-6-29 10:15 發表
Really?  May I know where is your daughter's painting class?  My younger one likes to draw.

原帖由 ZZdaphne 於 10-6-29 02:05 發表
不過最主要都係女兒無音樂細胞和天份mouth:" />

以上純粹個人經驗和觀點,不涉其他.