用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 Do you have the same view?
發新帖
查看: 2119|回覆: 18
go

Do you have the same view? [複製鏈接]


686
1#
發表於 09-9-21 21:55 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
   0    0    0    0

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5500
2#
發表於 09-9-21 22:22 |只看該作者

回覆 1# wisekid2007 的文章

I share with the teacher's view.  I only read two chapters, and find that some contents are violent, quite like those written by John Grisham.

Having said that, I find that your boy is very good writer.

Rank: 4


626
3#
發表於 09-9-22 01:10 |只看該作者
WOW, I am totally impressed by your son's writing. Wow.

I think it shows a good principal/educator to show this concern, however, if you as the parent feels you are not worried about your child being violent... then I think you might want to talk to your son about these "scenes" in his head are indeed just "imaginary".

It's not everyday you meet a child who CAN write like this.

Rank: 2


93
4#
發表於 09-9-22 10:28 |只看該作者
I have to agree with the English Dept. head.

I have read a few chapters of your son's novel and find them very age inappropriate for an 8 years old writer.

This matter should be dealt with seriously.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1911
5#
發表於 09-9-22 11:50 |只看該作者
Good that your son has a department head like this.

Your son's English is good.  No doubt about it.  But, put it this way, would you let a 8-y-o read something similar unmonitored?


686
6#
發表於 09-9-22 12:10 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1911
7#
發表於 09-9-22 13:40 |只看該作者
Nobody says (and I certainly don't) that there is anything immoral, unlawful or unethical in your son's writing.  But age appropriateness is not just about moral and ethics, isn't it?  I am not a psychologist but it seems to me that there is a lot of tension, pressure and conflict in your son's story.  Obviously he is a very sensitive to his surroundings.  A challenge to parents.  Have you watched the movie "KJ"?  Your son somehow reminds me of KJ.  Link here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffZukgD8Sws&feature=player_embedded


686
8#
發表於 09-9-22 18:01 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6805
9#
發表於 09-9-22 18:12 |只看該作者
Obviously your son is a genius.  Isnt it a bit wasting your time to get views from ordinary parents like us.. or like me?  If this is bugging you, i think you should get specialists' opinion.
Mighty
love you for you
自分に負けるな!!


706
10#
發表於 09-9-22 18:34 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
11#
發表於 09-9-22 20:03 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6805
12#
發表於 09-9-22 20:04 |只看該作者
我不覚得有問題、如果我有個天才児女、我都想公開作品!!  他留LINK,没問題、没興趣的根本就不会打開。REXIMOM,過去的就譲它一切隨風、天下之大、何必介懐!!
Mighty
love you for you
自分に負けるな!!

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


6361
13#
發表於 09-9-22 23:42 |只看該作者
希望兩位不要吵了, 我會留意是否有不適當宣傳, 現在可以接受, 希望大家理性討論, 不要老像小孩子吵架啦.:loveliness:

Rank: 1


27
14#
發表於 09-9-23 09:36 |只看該作者
原帖由 Reximom 於 09-9-22 18:34 發表


哈哈哈, 你真係聰明, 終於睇得出!


樓主根本就唔係在意想要你地既comment, 佢只不過係想借d意將佢個仔出書既消息同個link留低, 因為佢之前開左N個佢個仔出書既TOPIC都被查封.

佢個寶貝仔係天下無敵既天才, 邊 ...


版主、樓主:請勿見怪,網絡世界真係乜嘢人都有,有啲人,大人大姐真係好唔識「尊重別人」,Reximom是BK其中一個表表者,希望讓一些年青人參考作為「反面教材」,也並不是存心搗亂和私人恩怨,本人都非常尊重版主意見和樓主的這個Topic!


作者: Reximom 時間: 08-9-8 13:58
有學歴、有事業既人, 唔等於思想唔係「阿嬋」一族. 無聽過人鬧”讀X片呀你”咩?
原帖由 Reximom 於09-8-7 11:41 發表
以前個代既父母, 就算係低下階層, 唔識字, 都好尊重d老師校長. 依家都唔知邊到走班咁既生番家長出呢?
原帖由 Reximom 於09-8-7 13:35 發表
啱, 社會上好多野都無人理既, 紋身, 穿環, 男人唔著上衣,女人著bra top...仲有講粗口, 當街打茄輪依邑, 煲煙....社會上都沒人會理你, 依你講係咪全部都係學校做得?
原帖由 Reximom 於2008-10-31 16:11:36 發表
立會議員比起個D九唔搭八既局長助理, 佢地d人工唔算高呀!
做立會議員成日要蒲頭出呢見人, 而d局長助理依家可以柄埋唒, 比起佢地立會議員直頭係廉價勞工tim!

原帖由 Reximom 於 09-8-17 17:39 發表
英皇6科14分有67%, 都未算好差, 另一傳統名校九華最後敢公佈個年6科14分得56%, 咁先至叫慘不忍睹.
但係有d九華fans仲死撐話現在會考要有成績全靠補習 , 我地九華人不屑做考試機器, 唔補習 , 所以會考成績就差囉, 但係我地九華人有”九華精神”喎. 我覺得呢d全屬廢話, 連基本學業水平都無, 得個“九華精神”有咩用呀, 呢種人咪叫不學無術囉.
“九華精神”已經成為呢d九華fans面對九華成績差既最後一塊 遮醜布.
原帖由 Reximom 於 09-8-19 09:19 發表
我都真的估中你next post內容, 實話”唔回了”, 我一早估中你會講呢句,不過到頭來你咪又會姣婆守唔到寡!
差太遠…你又講得啱架, 你低我咁多, 你都係唔回吧!
原帖由 Reximom 於 09-8-23 21:40 發表

   引用:
   原帖由 SamuelChris 於 09-8-23 21:05 發表
   其實大家都有心儀的學校,何苦在此數互相單打。
   大家都想子女在一個開心的環境下讀書,
   這個平台是讓大家交流意見,大家可以各舒己見,
   又何必針鋒相對呢? ...

廢話!

原帖由 Reximom 於2009-9-2 11:33 發表
版主,
In fact, as your above posts are absolutely useless (now that your views have been made known), I suggest that you should (物盡其用 及 支持環保 ie.) use your posts instead of toilet paper when you discharge your "parental duty".

版主
, 你段野你批准講架, 唔好玩double standard delete 佢呀!


原帖由 Reximom 於2009-9-2 11:35 發表
引用:



原帖由 thankful 於 09-9-2 11:27 發表
Perhaps to some parents, acquiring the "right" connections is much more important than acquiring knowledge and good academic results.  Thank you for giving us one example of the different reasons why  ...
執人matthewdad口水尾!
In fact,  your above posts are absolutely useless (now that your views have been made known), I suggest that you should (物盡其用 及 支持環保 ie.) use your posts instead of toilet paper when you discharge your "parental duty".


706
15#
發表於 09-9-23 11:43 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
16#
發表於 09-9-23 12:01 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


147
17#
發表於 09-9-23 14:27 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


686
18#
發表於 09-9-23 14:38 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


6361
19#
發表於 09-9-24 09:52 |只看該作者
對於有會員一再挑釁其他會員, 我已在以下topic出了最後警告:

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2152643&extra=page%3D1

wisekid2007, 我看到你生氣, 不過記得不可以人身攻擊, 下次舉報就可以了. 謝謝合作.

edea
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖