- 在線時間
- 113 小時
- 最後登錄
- 09-4-16
- 國民生產力
- 63
- 附加生產力
- 2
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-9-19
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 35
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 100
- UID
- 158422

|
This is my observation during the 2nd interview:
We went for the 2nd interview in the morining of 29/09. We were led by a staff to get into a room with another 6 pairs of parents. The parents and the interviewer (i.e. a teahcer) sat around the table and I chose a seat adjacent to the teacher. That's why I could peek on the teacher's marking sheets from time to time. Firstly, the teacher asked us to give comments on the mission and visions of the A-school. Each pair of parents were required to take turn to express their opinion. After that, the teaher gave chance to the parents to ask him questions about the school. Each pair of parents could raise not more than one question. When all the parents have finished their questions, the teacher said the interview had finished and we could go. However, during the whole interview session, I did not see him put down any comments or marks on the marking sheets. So that's why I suppose the 2nd interview could be some sort of opinion sharing or formality. But I noticed one strange thing. From the marking sheets, I found there were altogether about 36 interview groups (valid if there was no afternoon interview session, as the top page of marking sheet only showed the information upto 29/09 morning). Let's assume 7 pairs of parents in one group, the total number of applicants invited for the 2nd interview was over 250. But as we know, there were only 150 seats offered this year, that means the school has to pick up 150 out of 250 applicants. What are their selection criteria? I don't know ....... because no marks were given? |
|