用戶登入
用戶名稱：
密      碼：
登記帳號忘記密碼

討論區

教育王國
教育講場
使用意見
幼兒教育
幼校討論
幼教雜談
小學教育
小一選校
小學雜談
中學教育
升中派位
中學交流
初中教育
專上教育
備戰大學
選科選校
國際教育
國際學校
海外留學
知識增值
課外活動
教材閱讀
公開考試
深造進修
特殊教育
特殊教育
資優教育
自閉寶寶
智能評估
徵求專區
二手市場
誠徵老師
組班專區
徵保母車

   聯絡管理員
搜索
教育王國 › 討論區 › 資優教育 › Interpretation of IQ Scores
發新帖
查看: 2462|回覆: 9
 go

Interpretation of IQ Scores [複製鏈接]

Y2KChild


750
1#
發表於 08-2-27 12:06 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
   0    0    0    0

返回頂部

foolish.mom

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
2#
發表於 08-2-27 19:27 |只看該作者
Y2KChild,
Not sure if the following answer will help.
I observed that, in HK, gifted children usually have verbal IQ > performance IQ. (Correct me if I am wrong.) My kid also has verbal IQ >150 & performance IQ =128. The EP also warned me of the big difference that he may not be outstanding when competing with other gifted children.
I suspect the difference may be because I emphasized verbal and logical training, thus he developed strong interest in these aspects. But I didn't give him chance to help with house work, take care of himself, etc. He is very weak in these aspects.
In a seminar delivered by Chinese University, the lady mentioned that IQ > 150 in any category may not be accurate any more due to ceiling effect. In my opinion, there is no need to do more IQ test so long as you find out that your kid is gifted. The number doesn't mean much. All you should do now is to give your child more exposure to find out his/her talents and interest.

返回頂部

seec

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
3#
發表於 08-2-28 11:04 |只看該作者
原文章由 foolish.mom 於 08-2-27 19:27 發表
Y2KChild,
Not sure if the following answer will help.
I observed that, in HK, gifted children usually have verbal IQ > performance IQ. (Correct me if I am wrong.) My kid also has verbal IQ >150 & perf ...


Hi!

Could you explain what it "ceiling effect" ?
Thx!

返回頂部

foolish.mom

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
4#
發表於 08-2-28 13:20 |只看該作者
seec,

When the kid gets full marks in some categories (near the ceiling), it may mean that he can still answer questions which are more difficult or at the next higher level. But they are not tested. A better approach is, in my opinion, to ask questions with increasing difficulty, and until the kid cannot answer a group of questions.

返回頂部

Y2KChild


750
5#
發表於 08-2-28 14:25 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

foolish.mom

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
6#
發表於 08-2-28 18:37 |只看該作者
Y2KChild,

Check this http://www.infokids.com.hk/epgy/index.html
Stanford University Education Programs for Gifted Youth

I only know that their Maths programs are good, but they also offer English writing.  You can take a look first or try. The good point is that they only accept talented kids after aptitude test. Then suppose their targets are this group of children.

返回頂部

christf


803
7#
發表於 08-2-28 22:24 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

Y2KChild


750
8#
發表於 08-2-29 11:45 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

seec

Rank: 3Rank: 3


284
9#
發表於 08-3-4 01:19 |只看該作者
原文章由 foolish.mom 於 08-2-27 19:27 發表
My kid also has verbal IQ >150 & perf ...


Hi! foolish.mom

Thank a lot!

actually my kid's test results is similar to yours.
verbal IQ is much more better than performance IQ.
I've to pay attention to this too.

返回頂部

accept

Rank: 1


7
10#
發表於 08-3-5 18:41 |只看該作者

回覆 #1 seec 的文章

Dear seec and foolish.mom,

Please let me know (i) where you did the HK-WISC for your kids and (ii) your experiences. Do you think there would be a certain degree of subjectivity in the EP's assessment e.g. the ways in which he or she talks to the kids being tested?

Please email me at [email protected] if you think this is more appropriate.

返回頂部

‹ 上一主題|下一主題 ›
返回列表
發新帖