足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲 - 小學雜談

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	235

21^#

發表於 05-6-19 08:26 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

agreed, I have the same case with you. My son is now learning in nursery and will start the kindergarden life coming Sept this year. Basically, he is willing and enjoy to go to school and do the workhome everyday.

bobbyhim

Mrssslui

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2713

22^#

發表於 05-6-20 11:12 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

I have a fd with a son born in Aug, she still let him to study P1 in a latter year.
Actually, some parents will let their children to be the big kids in class to gain better acedmic result as well as self-confidence.

MKY

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	1116

23^#

發表於 05-6-21 16:21 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

Hello,

其實我都同意你們大仔讀書, 但如果我仔仔是03年10中出生,
可否給我意見呢, 如果我下年06年讀k1, 只得2歲10個月, 細仔, 但如果再遲一年07年讀k1, 已經3歲10個月, 是否又太大呢, 到讀小學時已經7歲, 會否超齡呢, 希望你們比些意見.

MyChung

民房

Rank: 1


	16

24^#

發表於 05-6-21 16:44 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

My son was also born on Dec 2001 and he will be also repeat K.1 on the coming Sept at the other kindergarten. I really hope that it is a correct decision because his performance in the class is rather good as per his teacher's comment.

Dickyma

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	254

25^#

發表於 05-6-21 17:40 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

我唔同意,我識得好多都是細仔
就讀幼稚園,現在已讀大學,其
實好視乎老師和課程配合是
否恰當.

tuenyima

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	363

26^#

發表於 05-6-21 17:49 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

我記得我小時候都係未足歲入學,我爸爸話我讀K1時只有兩歲多dd,爸爸話因為係我自己成日話想去返學 -- 因為當時鄰居有一位女孩比我大一年,佢係我o既玩伴,點知後來佢足三歲去咗返學,所以我同爸爸講我又要返學.

當時有冇學習上o既問題我就唔知,我只係記得我升小一時好麻煩,攪到last minute至有小學肯收我,我爸爸四維撲,不知幾徬徨,驚冇學校肯收我,好彩最後都有學校肯收.

而之後我無論讀小學,中學,甚至大學,我都係全班年紀最細o個個,但自此之後我考試從來都係頭三名!大學畢業時都未足22歲! 我咁講唔係因為我想o係度認叻,而係想講,唔可以個個case一概而論,如果個小朋友能力強,應付得到,就算係"細仔"都唔一定要佢repeat.

[img align=left]http://onfinite.com/libraries/487250/185.jpg[/img]

我愛小端宜 :-D

BoBoCute

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2155

27^#

發表於 05-6-21 18:25 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

hi My Chung,
If his performance is good, i don't see why he has to repeat.  Some kids are smarter than others.  So 'small' kids not necessarily worse than 'big' kids.  'Big' kids can do badly too.
My daughter was born in Nov.  She is happy at school and according to the teacher, her performance at school is average.  I will let her promote to K.2 next year.
My husband also born in Nov and used to be the youngest at class.  He's an accountant now.
My sister in law, born in Oct, even 在外國跳高

Mrssslui

Rank: 5 Rank: 5


	2713

28^#

發表於 05-6-22 10:26 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

totally agree w BoBoCute.

Heihmom

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	119

29^#

發表於 05-6-26 13:36 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

My son was also born in mid-December. According to his kindergarten teachers, he's doing well at school, even better than some of the "bigger" boys and girls. So I let him promote to higher form normally. There's no problem at all.

ICHUN

別墅

Rank: 4


	994

30^#

發表於 05-6-26 14:05 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

Agree. Me too. My son is also born in Mid-December. He has accepted by many schools (APS, KTS, Ramondi College Primary School, St. Joseph).

I will let him go to SFA this September. He is now under waitlist of DBSPD and I am "knock door" at La Salle (we are in Net 41).

MKma

別墅

Rank: 4


	518

31^#

發表於 05-6-26 16:19 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

其實就算是同年同月生的小朋友，每個人的智力發展速度都各有不同，不可說細囝囝囡囡一定不如較大的小朋友。但大小肌肉的發展，大仔/女又確是較佳。

尤其是各方面發展都是普普通通(average)的男孩子，都是讓他做大仔比較好，起碼他會較有自信和比其他小朋友有較佳的能力。不用因是細仔而追不上進度，因而自少飽受打擊，令他們有可能變得退縮和內向。

LindaFong

洋房

Rank: 2


	68

32^#

發表於 05-7-12 22:52 |只看該作者

Re: 足歲入學較佳重讀寧早勿遲

I want to say is ---- when you send your child's detail to the primary school to apply P1, the principle only concern their date of birth or the kindergarten performance. In the kindergarten report everybody will take A or B grade, no remark or performance to the is bad. To interview the school also not accept to take an exam for the kid. So, what do you think the principle will concern?