用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 耀中VS汉基。那间好些?谢谢
樓主: bellalee228
go

耀中VS汉基。那间好些?谢谢 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1987
81#
發表於 14-4-1 12:03 |只看該作者
foolish.mom 發表於 14-4-1 11:42
回覆 EstelleTong 的帖子

Yew Chung is my son's 1st school until he graduated from primary.  He then  ...

I think this is by far the most accurate picture of YC i have seen on EK. Kinder and primary of YC are both very good, except the less than ideal standard of english which some Ekers mind so.... much (to the extent turning their eyes blind to all other attributes). But the poor secondary went into a self destructive loop, sadly. So you see some best YC primary students go to CIS, for instance.

The schooling in CIS is, i heard, not as mystified as mentioned in EK, but they attracted many good students from IS, and that's all that matters.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1614
82#
發表於 14-4-1 12:08 |只看該作者
foolish.mom 發表於 14-4-1 11:42
回覆 EstelleTong 的帖子

Yew Chung is my son's 1st school until he graduated from primary.  He then  ...
  最終都係睇成績, 求學始終都係求分數.  輸在終點前慘過贏在起跑線.

點評

foolish.mom  You are right. At upper secondary, the only things that matter are the IB score, SAT score, and what can be written in the activity resume.  發表於 14-4-1 20:02

Rank: 2


52
83#
發表於 14-4-1 12:44 |只看該作者

回覆:foolish.mom 的帖子

Very useful and realistic comments



Rank: 2


52
84#
發表於 14-4-1 13:00 |只看該作者

回覆:耀中VS汉基。那间好些?谢谢

I mean foolish.mom is v realistic comments,



Rank: 2


52
85#
發表於 14-4-1 13:03 |只看該作者

回覆:himching 的帖子

Very  typical and traditional chinese parents definition of winners and losers ....



Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


21695
86#
發表於 14-4-1 13:05 |只看該作者
回覆 foolish.mom 的帖子

Good points!  The influx of good students and the ability to draw these students has really built the reputations and results of several IS.  It does make one wonder if it is the schools or the students that really matter in the end.

點評

foolish.mom  CIS uses 30 years to build up the reputation, It's still a short time as compared with traditional schools like SPCC, DGS, DBS. But reputation is a delicate thing that can be ruined easily.  發表於 14-4-1 20:06
今日佳句: 我以往也以為國際板的家長也有質素,但現在才知deal with 一些麻煩家長也不易!  

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
87#
發表於 14-4-1 16:38 |只看該作者
回覆 HKTHK 的帖子

About half of CIS IBDP students started in reception.  Yes, they are excellent kids.

點評

Choisumwong  But they are very selected cases.  發表於 14-4-1 17:05

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1195
88#
發表於 14-4-3 15:12 |只看該作者
CIS vs. YC - absolutely different levels, can't even compare.....

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5822
89#
發表於 14-4-3 15:34 |只看該作者
回覆 foolish.mom 的帖子

Besides reputation, how do you compare school system, principal, admin etc? Do you think that these aspects help in building the school and attracting/retaining good students, and if so, CIS is outstanding in these aspects?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


9569
90#
發表於 14-4-3 15:54 |只看該作者
小冬姑 發表於 14-4-3 15:12
CIS vs. YC - absolutely different levels, can't even compare.....
Of course you can compare, their tuition fees are at the same level

Rank: 4


546
91#
發表於 14-4-3 18:49 |只看該作者

回覆:耀中VS汉基。那间好些?谢谢

CIS



Rank: 3Rank: 3


158
92#
發表於 14-4-4 11:59 |只看該作者

回覆:foolish.mom 的帖子

Hi foolish mom ,did ur son went to yc 2 years class ? I know they have half day n whole day, can u advise which one is better ?



Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
93#
發表於 14-4-4 23:55 |只看該作者
回覆 Mamamu1126 的帖子

He went to half day school of YC's 2 year old class, because it's more economical.  I think full day school is better in language immersion, but half day school is better if you want to arrange other extra-curricular activities for the kid.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1418
94#
發表於 14-4-5 00:10 |只看該作者
回覆 caa 的帖子

CIS is more organised in administration, as it is a more established school.  
I am not in a good position to comment on other aspects, as my son studied in YC in primary school, but in CIS secondary school only.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


158
95#
發表於 14-4-5 14:18 |只看該作者

回覆:foolish.mom 的帖子

Thanks for ur comment foolish mom, my son will go whole day class this year sept



‹ 上一主題|下一主題