RTHK 19/Feb 鏗鏘集 - 國際學校誰讀? - 國際學校

登錄 | 註冊

討論區

教育王國: 教育講場; 使用意見

幼兒教育: 幼校討論; 幼教雜談

小學教育: 小一選校; 小學雜談

中學教育: 升中派位; 中學交流; 初中教育

專上教育: 備戰大學; 選科選校

國際教育: 國際學校; 海外留學

知識增值: 課外活動; 教材閱讀; 公開考試; 深造進修

特殊教育: 特殊教育; 資優教育; 自閉寶寶; 智能評估

徵求專區: 二手市場; 誠徵老師; 組班專區; 徵保母車

聯絡管理員

我的中心

教育王國 › 討論區 › 國際學校 › RTHK 19/Feb 鏗鏘集 - 國際學校誰讀?

1 2 34

樓主: FattyDaddy	go RTHK 19/Feb 鏗鏘集 - 國際學校誰讀? [複製鏈接]

FattyDaddy

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	9572

61^#

發表於 12-2-26 02:53 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 FattyDaddy 於 12-2-26 04:10 編輯

madscientist 發表於 12-2-26 02:39
Why would ESF care about HK parents' wishes or their inclinations when their ESF schools are all overwhelmed by Cat 1s?

You're right, the regular ESF schools don't care and so they stick to their categorization system, but there is no reason why ESF should not want to cater for the wider Cantonese speaking public with their PIS schools {:1_1:}

Why create two systems.

Why not? Branding is very common in marketing, that's why we see Dolce&Gabanna and D&G, same company, different product lines targeting different customers.

返回頂部

madscientist

禁止訪問


	893

62^#

發表於 12-2-26 04:11 |只看該作者

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

返回頂部

FattyDaddy

男爵府

Rank: 6 Rank: 6


	9572

63^#

發表於 12-2-26 05:18 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 FattyDaddy 於 12-2-26 05:19 編輯

madscientist 發表於 12-2-26 04:11
The reason ESF created two PIS was that they did not get the funding ...

Once again you're right, ESF did not get the funding so if they create new schools they must be PIS, hence ESF had 2 choices:-

(1) Do nothing. Don't create new schools because PIS must be run differently and ESF is just not interested.

(2) Create new PIS schools and live with the troubles of maintaining 2 systems.

They opted for (2). Mind you, they were not forced into that choice, if they had no interest in serving the wider Cantonese speaking public they could have chosen (1) and did nothing.

You can of course say ESF chose (2) simply because they wanted expansion and money and the needs of Cantonese speaking Hongkongers never crossed their minds, I guess I don't have the same amount of skepticism {:1_1:}

返回頂部

baby8

複式洋房

Rank: 3 Rank: 3


	161

64^#

發表於 12-2-27 20:27 |只看該作者

I found foreign parents put their child in local kindergarten and primary school in order to learn Mandarin. (KCPS in North Point). I don't think there is any problem for young child to learn two language at the same time. We put our children in IS is that it can provide a better English environment for them to learn a second language. If those foreign parents have already provided an English environment at home why refuse to put their children in local Chinese environment ? Foreigners that can speak fluent Chinese in future has greater advantage than Chinese that can speak fluent English (simply supply/demand I think)