用戶登入
用戶名稱：
密      碼：
登記帳號忘記密碼

討論區

教育王國
教育講場
使用意見
幼兒教育
幼校討論
幼教雜談
小學教育
小一選校
小學雜談
中學教育
升中派位
中學交流
初中教育
專上教育
備戰大學
選科選校
國際教育
國際學校
海外留學
知識增值
課外活動
教材閱讀
公開考試
深造進修
特殊教育
特殊教育
資優教育
自閉寶寶
智能評估
徵求專區
二手市場
誠徵老師
組班專區
徵保母車

   聯絡管理員
搜索
教育王國 › 討論區 › 國際學校 › ESF_NEWS _英基倘失資助......
發新帖
查看: 2845|回覆: 11
 go

ESF_NEWS _英基倘失資助...... [複製鏈接]

polyu4537

Rank: 3Rank: 3


281
1#
發表於 11-12-13 09:13 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印
1. http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E8%8B%B1%E5%9F%BA%E5%80%98%E5%A4%B1%E8%B3%87%E5%8A%A9-%E5%AD%B8%E8%B2%BB%E9%A0%88%E5%8A%A027-223000848.html

2. http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/template/apple/art_main.php?iss_id=20111213&sec_id=4104&subsec_id=11867&art_id=15887939
   0    0    0    0

返回頂部

c200

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1044
2#
發表於 11-12-13 09:35 |只看該作者
冇計,要加學費啦

返回頂部

WYmom

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4747
3#
發表於 11-12-13 09:57 |只看該作者
ESF management always only ask for increase in fees, and never reduce their unnecessary cost, such as their bulk adm. cost, wastage of over $100K in duplication of printing ballot papers due to adm. fault, very high fringe benefits for the management...etc.

Actually the govt should offer subsidies to the 70% local residents in form of cash voucher.

Even if all ESF schools change to PIS, the fee should not be higher than that of RC and DC... increase of 27% is very unreasonable!

[ 本帖最後由 WYmom 於 11-12-13 10:01 編輯 ]

返回頂部

c200

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1044
4#
發表於 11-12-13 10:09 |只看該作者
I guess they will use Debenture Program as well

返回頂部

Christi

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6493
5#
發表於 11-12-14 00:32 |只看該作者

回復 3# WYmom 的帖子

英基成日都擺家長上枱作為同政府的談判籌碼. 加就係要加,但加２７％條數點計？　

返回頂部

mingmingyinyin

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5444
6#
發表於 11-12-14 10:15 |只看該作者
對英基的兩間PIS -RC和DC又會有影響嗎？

返回頂部

oooray

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4454
7#
發表於 11-12-14 10:49 |只看該作者
原帖由 WYmom 於 11-12-13 09:57 發表
ESF management always only ask for increase in fees, and never reduce their unnecessary cost, such as their bulk adm. cost, wastage of over $100K in duplication of printing ballot papers due to adm. f ...

Yes. ESF shows no sincerity in negotiation with government.
Just bringing up Hong Kong as a "World City" and we need international education (everybody knows that simply fact) without any proposals/action plans how ESF can play the role proactively and is deserved to get more subvention from the taxpayer.
Keep pushing the parents to shout at the government/Legco members without convincing arguments does not really help but it does give a negative image to the public.
I have prepared the worst by spending less and paying more in the coming years...

返回頂部

poonseelai

Rank: 8Rank: 8


19528
8#
發表於 11-12-14 11:04 |只看該作者
I still don't understand the logic of asking for more government subsidies as "逾七成學生父母其中一方持本港永久居民身份證".  If this is the case, almost all private schools in HK should have received subsidies.

返回頂部

oooray

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4454
9#
發表於 11-12-14 11:10 |只看該作者
原帖由 mingmingyinyin 於 11-12-14 10:15 發表
對英基的兩間PIS -RC和DC又會有影響嗎？

If ESF tuition fee is shooting up, there is a golden opportunity for PIS (and  other IS as well) to increase their fee.
keep their remuneration packages competitive for IB teachers/management is always the best excuse...

返回頂部

alpham0m

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1252
10#
發表於 11-12-14 14:01 |只看該作者
I think ESF is trying to position itself as the "public schools" in the international school sector, which I think is a fair point. 70% of the kids' parents are tax-paying HK residences and should enjoy some form of subsidy just like tax-paying HK parents who send their kids to local public schools. cash coupon could be a way out...

[ 本帖最後由 alpham0m 於 11-12-14 14:04 編輯 ]

返回頂部

bobbycheung

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4564
11#
發表於 11-12-14 17:08 |只看該作者
ESF's "1.2萬名學生中，逾七成學生父母其中一方持本港永久居民身份證"

63% of CIS's students were born in HK.  I guess it too has more or less the same percentage of parents holding permanent ID cards.  Shouldn't they be given subsidies as well?   How about those ID card holding parents in Singapore International School?  I am sure the percentage is similar.

   

返回頂部

alpham0m

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1252
12#
發表於 11-12-14 17:40 |只看該作者
fair enough, but I think ESF is also trying to hang on to the point that it is "a historical legacy from the British colonial era", which makes it a bit different to other international schools. this is my own interpretation only.

返回頂部

‹ 上一主題|下一主題 ›
返回列表
發新帖