- 在線時間
- 5482 小時
- 最後登錄
- 25-5-24
- 國民生產力
- 70
- 附加生產力
- 87671
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 30048
- 主題
- 289
- 精華
- 3
- 積分
- 117789
- UID
- 107125
   
|
回復 20# papa_pop 的帖子
papa_pop
Long time no see.......
Personally, I agreed with your factor one, as I know HKDSE will struggle for some years before getting real "international recognization". If I want to prepare my son for different destinations for post-secondary education, IB is the best option at this point.
For factor two,we may also need to consider other elements. Your numbers represent some phenomenon in those countries, but we also bear in mind, in USA, even you have IBDP results, you still need to have SAT results and some students also have AP; the same in UK, GCSE also a very basic requirement in public and private schools (ESF follow the same pattern).
For LPC is not a good example, as it's not the same case in your and my kid's school. They used HKCEE exam results + Chalenge Day + Interview to recruit right students for IBDP. No more HKCEE, LPC replaced HKCEE with an appitude test. They screened the applicants and picked the "best fit" (not the best). The same in some DSS schools in HK like SPCC and DBS. In your son's school may assume all kids are fit for IBDP.
In previous post, I stated my stand on the 3 programs. The Pre-IB or bridging program serves two roles in HK situation.
1. In NSS, the senior high has three years, but IBDP only last for two years. For the continuity, the Pre-IB (MYP) can optimise the three years duration;
2. The teaching and learning methods of IBDP have a gap cf NSS, the additional year can help the students to adapt the new methodologies.
In your conclusion, I also agreed. No single system fits all, as parents we need to be open and sensible to select a right program for our dear children.
ANChan59 |
|