- 在線時間
- 148 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-4-5
- 國民生產力
- 26
- 附加生產力
- 1613
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-10-30
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1209
- 主題
- 42
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2848
- UID
- 674229
 
|
CKY is very good. If you have enough financial support and get accepted, no doubt go there instead of TSL, unless you want your child go to traditional model in secondary school. e.g.in TSL, the P6 alloation is good for certain percentage of students with good academic results, they can go for good schools in HK (e.g. wah yan, st paul etc..)
TSL, traditional model with less stress, yet good curriculum, good English and Chinese in writing, not verbal (only small percentage of students speak fluent English and Mandarin). In CKY most of the student speak beautiful Chinese and English and they were prepared to go for IB. Kids in both school as I observed enjoy happy school life and good development due to the good curriculum, language policy and administration of the school
Some kids feel more secure in traditional models, some kids love more flexible and creative means of learning. Some kids feel comfortable at the begining with the traditional model, but later love more creative means..
See how you assess your kids' learning needs
Both are good schools in terms of admin...with good quality teachers and curriculum..
原帖由 penguin_chick 於 10-11-21 17:23 發表 
請問cky中學的語文學術程度怎樣遜色？在那方面可看到？請指教，好讓小學生可及早補求。謝謝！
[ 本帖最後由 motherotk 於 10-11-22 07:08 編輯 ] |
|
發表於 10-11-19 11:55
