- 在線時間
- 3 小時
- 最後登錄
- 15-11-7
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 2
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-10-19
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 178
- 主題
- 6
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 180
- UID
- 32761
 
|
Re: 政府資助名校質數下降?
This brings us back to the basic question - what is wrong with letting the schools decide on their intake? In the old days each school can decide on what students to accept. The "gap" between schools is not as great. There may, for example, be very little difference between (say) La Salle and DBS. Nowadays La Salle is part of the "lottery game" and DBS can control its own intake.
What does the government expect to achieve by diluting the standard of the schools? It will not improve standards. It will only create the impression that everyone has the same or equal chance of getting into "traditional" elite schools, but if the game continues the "traditional" elite schools will have nothing left except their names.
Charlotte_mom 寫道:
我公司既其中一個"業務", 係開幼稚園既, 所以我老闆都會留下呢d野
一早我地都係咁覺得啦, 攪珠派位, 必然既結果係龍蛇混雜, 大家要理智d去承認, 唔係個個家長都咁著緊小朋友, 或者有能力去應付小朋友功課, 有好多家長(我唔係歧視)連英文學校通告都未識睇, 點幫到小朋友睇功課? 真係靠先生教就ok?
學校要就晒所以學生既程度, 唯一既途徑就係調低水平黎適應(總無理由學校maintain以住既高水平, 然後有大量學生fail, 什至踢出校掛?) 長遠黎睇, 有咩結果大家心知肚明
所以聽聞st. paul's co-ed之前攪左好耐轉唔轉直資, 政府成日玩改革, 就係想"打擊"呢d大勢力既傳統名校, 等佢地無咁囂張, spcc想維持自主, 就要轉直資, 但d神父又覺得違背左"教育"既意義, 所以爭持左好耐而家至有"直資+助學金"既個concept |
|
發表於 04-11-16 23:42
