- 在線時間
- 114 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-7-30
- 國民生產力
- 4
- 附加生產力
- 2
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-12-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 379
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 385
- UID
- 171442
 
|
If you are merely talking about a language skill, this can be handled by additional extra classes and home support. However, please remember that a lot of local school students are also failing Chinese. So it is hard to say WHAT way of learning Chinese is best.
I think we need to understand that education is never the learning of language(s). We are talking about the way children are inspired to learn and how to make them love to learn.
Who knows what is going to happen in 20 years time? And I do not think employers would only look for good Chinese. Are there other skills that are as or even more important?
If you are talking about good Chinese, Hong Kongers would never be better than people in China or Taiwan. In China only, they have millions of people with much better Chinese than we do. What WE can contribute is something else they do not have (yet): brains, minds, mentalities. I am not saying we are smarter. But Hong Kong people, in general, think differently because we are not limited by the typical Chinese Communist mindset or the typical traditional Chinese cultural mindset.
And IS students are again different from local school students because IS students are used to thinking yet differently too. This is a complicated issue that involves not only the curriculum but also the cultural and political immersion.
Further the educational model in international schools provide a lot of space for children to think and develop. Honestly, IS students might not turn out to be really that good at English as a language. But they are always given chances to develop in almost all areas, including arts and sports.
No one would disgree with you if you say that IS students do not have Chinese skills as good. But how good do we NEED? And how much of the skills we are willing to sacrifice for international school education? International school education is, in my views, better. (I am sure many people would disagree, but this is my personal views.) Yet I also understand that my children will be less exposed to Chinese culture and Chinese literature. I would be happy if I can have both worlds but I am willing to take less in one of the sides. My children will not be studying as much Chinese history and they will probably never be able to read the book Three Kingdoms. But I am happy with what I get so far. |
|