用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 國際學校 ESF點排好?
樓主: Falcon媽媽
go

[小學] ESF點排好?   [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1655
101#
發表於 23-6-8 10:29 |只看該作者
提示: 該帖被管理員或版主屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


191
102#
發表於 23-6-8 10:39 |只看該作者
Falcon媽媽 發表於 23-6-8 10:21
They didn't even mention the priority of existing ESF kinder in their website.
I supposed because K graduates are now guaranteed a place in primary.  Then naturally they have to place all these kids before they even consider the ones on the priority list (NR, siblings, alumni etc).

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
103#
發表於 23-6-8 10:41 |只看該作者
ribenaberry 發表於 23-6-8 10:39
I supposed because K graduates are now guaranteed a place in primary.  Then naturally they have to p ...

but e.g. kjs, they definitely will offer the one with fp but outsider more than esf kinder with no fp....

Rank: 4


774
104#
發表於 23-6-8 10:43 |只看該作者
Since it is through-train, existing K2 kids do not need to go through Y1 central applications. They will have "transition" process which will happen in early September. Y1 places will be allocated to them ahead of Y1 central applications process. So, kindy kids will receive Y1 places before any priorities.

Last year, SJS didn't even have enough places for all in-zone K2. They didn't interview any kid from central applications.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
105#
發表於 23-6-8 10:48 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 10:43
Since it is through-train, existing K2 kids do not need to go through Y1 central applications. They  ...

yes i know, and plus the new drop zoning policy, im frustrated how to allocate SJS and RC (which one be the first) as i dont have fp. Im afraid if i take a risk for "gambling the luck" of SJS, i will lose the chance of getting to RC as well.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
106#
發表於 23-6-8 10:50 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 10:43
Since it is through-train, existing K2 kids do not need to go through Y1 central applications. They  ...

as i live in MOS, what do u think about KJS, BHS and CWB?? but seems KJS and CWB no school bus to MOS.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


191
107#
發表於 23-6-8 10:51 |只看該作者
Falcon媽媽 發表於 23-6-8 10:41
but e.g. kjs, they definitely will offer the one with fp but outsider more than esf kinder with no  ...
Yes of course they need to factor in preference for those with FP for the 70% requirement for KJS and SJS etc.
eg. ESF K kids with FP will have higher chance of getting their choice of school than ESF K kids without FP.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


191
108#
發表於 23-6-8 10:54 |只看該作者
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

I think chances are pretty low for P1 place in SJS and KJS if you are not ESF kindie and without FP.  A lot of ESF K kids without FP did not get into first choice KJS/SJS.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1070
109#
發表於 23-6-8 10:56 |只看該作者
ribenaberry 發表於 23-6-8 09:57
Actually I think they changed the order of priorities after they introduced Kindergarten through tr ...
That is consistent to the time frame and the mechanism that I have understood: Stage 1 Placing all current ESF kindy pupils to their selected schools according to priority; then Stage 2, after all ESF kindy being placed, considering external applications according to the same priority eg siblings, staff kids, FP etc. Correct me if I am wrong.
But if that's case, I don't see any chance with spaces remained available at KJS and SJS at Stage 2. Again, corrent me if I am wrong.

Rank: 4


774
110#
發表於 23-6-8 10:58 |只看該作者
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

I think there are enough K2 with FP, sibling and alumni priorities from all 5 kindergartens to take up all SJS and KJS Y1 places. So they don't need to offer any place to central application applicants.
SJS+KJS = 300 Y1 places
Just TY+TC+WKS = around 600 K2, assuming 50% have FP = 300 + K2 non FP with sibling/alumni priority

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
111#
發表於 23-6-8 11:09 |只看該作者
ribenaberry 發表於 23-6-8 10:54
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

I think chances are pretty low for P1 place in SJS and KJS if you are not ES ...

我意思就係kjs, sjs可能1個位都比唔到non fp esf kinder, 所以就諗梗博唔博,博唔到既話我放左RC係第2,但新policy下我唔知有幾多個non fp esf kinder會放rc第1,到時我驚rc d位都fill up晒,會唔知allocate我個仔去邊。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
112#
發表於 23-6-8 11:10 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 10:58
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

I think there are enough K2 with FP, sibling and alumni priorities from all  ...
我意思就係kjs, sjs可能1個位都比唔到non fp esf kinder, 所以就諗梗博唔博,博唔到既話我放左RC係第2,但新policy下我唔知有幾多個non fp esf kinder會放rc第1,到時我驚rc d位都fill up晒,會唔知allocate我個仔去邊。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
113#
發表於 23-6-8 11:13 |只看該作者
sainsbury 發表於 23-6-8 10:56
That is consistent to the time frame and the mechanism that I have understood: Stage 1 Placing all c ...
i think u are right, actually all ESF kinder already fill up all the places. A parent told me that her daughter's classmates (SJS) 80% are from ESF WKS, of coz drop zoning policy now, dunno how many ESF WKS can get the place in this year.

Rank: 4


774
114#
發表於 23-6-8 11:26 |只看該作者
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

Just my thoughts:
1. Since BHS will go to IS, I think some "BHS zone" parents may choose KJS/CWB so that the kids will go to  KGV .

2. Tsuen Wan was in BHS zone. But it is also convenient for the kids to go to SJS/KJS.

3. Since CWB will go to KGV, CWB may become a more popular choice?

P.S. We live in Kam Tin, our son now goes to SJS Y6 (zone). If we had a choice, we would choose KJS.

Rank: 4


774
115#
發表於 23-6-8 11:32 |只看該作者
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

1. SJS 2. RC
If you cannot get SJS, I think you can still go into RC?

From my understanding, ESF allocates places by working down the priorities and random number one by one (not like EDB allocates by rounds)? So lower random number kids should not get a place before you?

You can double check with ESF central admissions team, if they will tell you.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
116#
發表於 23-6-8 11:52 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 11:26
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

Just my thoughts:
Kam Tin is in Yuen Long???? why the zone is SJS??? so far away...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
117#
發表於 23-6-8 11:53 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 Falcon媽媽 於 23-6-8 11:55 編輯
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 11:32
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

1. SJS 2. RC

I'm afraid I will get a poor random number, and don't choose RC as first place and at that time RC is being filled up, I may allocated to 3rd, 4th choice or even DC...

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2162
118#
發表於 23-6-8 12:01 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 11:26
回覆 Falcon媽媽 的帖子

Just my thoughts:

do u think sjs is good?? is it academic focus?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8619
119#
發表於 23-6-8 12:22 |只看該作者
Daks 發表於 23-6-8 10:43
Since it is through-train, existing K2 kids do not need to go through Y1 central applications. They  ...

本帖最後由 mandy_ng207 於 23-6-8 12:36 編輯

Oh correct me if I am wrong…if a non ESF K applicant has a sibling in SJS, will the application be processed before or after K kids applications? And also for staff kids…they may not be able to get into their first choice if places are filled up by K kids?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1070
120#
發表於 23-6-8 13:06 |只看該作者
mandy_ng207 發表於 23-6-8 12:22
本帖最後由 mandy_ng207 於 23-6-8 12:36 編輯

Oh correct me if I am wrong…if a non ESF K applican ...
I think thats wrong under the through-train system and given admission time frame.
Correct me if I m wrong though lol.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖 回覆
你需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊