- 在線時間
- 150 小時
- 最後登錄
- 18-9-13
- 國民生產力
- 6
- 附加生產力
- 1326
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-4-22
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 246
- 主題
- 5
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1578
- UID
- 134097
|
本帖最後由 ikerberg 於 14-2-15 08:35 編輯
I have nothing more to add, except the following two points:
1. Achieving success without working hard is a myth which only happens in fairy tales, or fictions if you like. Can you imagine, say, finishing a law degree, or becoming a doctor is a result of learning without stress? Some positive stress helps kids achieve progress, not just in academics, but also in the wholesome development along the path to an adult with strong mentality and resilience, which is more needed cos' in one day, we have to loosen our grasp, let go, and let them thrive on thier own.
2. When we mention 'creativity', is it measurable? Can I objectively say one school produces more 'creative' kids, while the other just stifle kids' creativity, without first building this argument on any basis? In my view, a school is good enough so long as 'creativity' is encouraged, not deterred nor discouraged....and on this ground of rich soil, the seeds of creativity in kids' DNA will grow and thrive |
|