- 在線時間
- 228 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-9-14
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 1202
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 197
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1399
- UID
- 109078
|
I think we should put aside unnecessary bickering. When one says he sees good IS students with such and such qualities, it doesn't help the disucssion by saying but we have DGS,DBS graduates with such and such academic results. There are top students in both streams, and with their top qualities, they should be able to fare well in another stream. A more constructive discussion would be to identify what qualifies of a particular stream "seems" to be missing from the other, and what is that? why is that? how can it be obtained elsewhere? This would be a more meaningful discussion. In fact, local stream is moving towards critical thinking, project assignments, whilst international stream only stresses on academics. Any disuccsion otherwise would be a debate like whether communism or capitalism is better system
|
|