- 在線時間
- 466 小時
- 最後登錄
- 22-7-1
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 2255
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-4-27
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 166
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2421
- UID
- 907569
 
|
For me, the curriculum is more important.
RC’s emphasis on both presentation skill and academic level is a big attraction to me.
For most dragon schools, the comment is that the academic level is not high.
For most project type schools, they also do not concentrate on academic development.
On the other hand, for the traditional type of schools, they only concentrate on academic development but do not develop the presentation skill.
So RC seems to be a good choice for it is looking for a balance of both. I am willing to pay the school fee for this type of teaching alone even if there is no guarantee of dragon. After all, what we want as parents is to choose a place that can help us to develop our kids in an all rounded manner. The only concern to me is that RC is so new so that I do not know how well this is being implemented.
|
|
發表於 13-2-3 23:19
like TL and St. Clare both are waiting and SH totally rejected.
