- 在線時間
- 31 小時
- 最後登錄
- 12-3-28
- 國民生產力
- 2
- 附加生產力
- 4
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-3-11
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 211
- 主題
- 3
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 217
- UID
- 713414
|
回覆eviepa, ANChan, cow 的文章
I always thought boys are better at numbers but you guys have disappointed me. I know I can be wrong but I need proof, not just you guys keeping on saying I'm wrong.
Let me exaggerate it a bit. If we keep other things unchanged and just relax the grading of additional maths further like IGCSE. If we had 30% candidates getting an A, you would then agree additional maths is easier in terms of getting a good grade. Now, we know the A% is significantly higher but we also know that the students taking additional maths are more capable in maths in general. Is this factor fully explained by the higher A% and A-C% in additional maths. This is the question.
I am beginning to understand why our perspectives are different. It is because you are men and I am a woman.
If we look at Queen's College, that is exactly the picture you want: the students are significantly better in maths than in additional maths.
The pattern is at odds with the overall statistics.
http://www.qc.edu.hk/
However, if we look at girls' schools, like Marymount http://www.mss.edu.hk/Achievement/hkcee/ce2010/ce2010.pdf or True Light http://www.tlmshk.edu.hk/academic3.php, the picture is just the opposite. This supports my belief that more hardworking students and girls perform better in additional maths, and maths has a better differentiating power than additional maths in telling whether the student is good at maths in general.
Beside, the performance of top schools will conform to the beliefs of you guys but the performance of less than top schools tend to behave otherwise.
Although my query has not been solved yet, I am prepared to let it rest. But next time, I expect you guys slightly more rigorous in your reasoning. Boys are supposed to be better in maths and logic.
[ 本帖最後由 雙儿 於 11-8-1 15:14 編輯 ] |
|