原帖由 chei05 於 10-11-17 23:40 發表 are you wroking in this school- staff ? why not trust TVB's news, I trust TVB will checked clearly before they announce this news, and this report not show clearly the details, and too complicated det ...
Clam down, don't pointing finger before verification. If you read my other posts, I am strongly against those schools talking IB approach for years, definitely you know I am not a staff or parents of Logos.
If you don't understand the audit report or too lazy to read it, just go to the section 5.41 related to the DSS school using HK$10M to buy 3 properties. (page 44)
原帖由 chei05 於 10-11-17 23:40 發表
are you wroking in this school- staff ? (Most common quote in HK.) why not trust TVB's news, I trust TVB will checked clearly before they announce this news (How do you know they did?), and this report not show clearly the details, and too complicated det ...
Clam down, don't pointing finger before verification. If you read my other posts, I am strongly against those schools talking IB approach for years, definitely you know I am not a staff or parents of Logos.
If you don't understand the audit report or too lazy to read it, just go to the section 5.41 related to the DSS school using HK$10M to buy 3 properties. (page 44)
Clam down, don't pointing finger before verification. If you read my other posts, I am strongly against those schools talking IB approach for years, definitely you know I am not a staff or parents o ...
原帖由 眼超超 於 10-11-18 00:38 發表
thank you for sharing, the report was so details.
You are welcome.
I watched most TV news channels tonight, only TVB disclosed Logos. I further chased headlines of Apple Daily, we all know their style of reporting, amazingly, very simple statement and provide a link of the complete audit report, so I read through the report and see so many gaps to draw a wrong conclusion against Logos.
This comments are not only related to LOGO, but related to all DSS schools...
I have two kids going through the P1 interviews in the past few years and all to DSS schools and I observed:
1) some "leaders" were really good in their presentations (say, consistent, genuine and understand or admit their own limitations)
2) some "leaders (e.g. principal, usually presented in seminer)" seemed to be presentable, seemed to have great "missions", seemed to be very "loving" and with great "visions" or "professional in education"
BUT.... you will see the inconsistencies in their "Presentations in Admission Seminar" and the "Realities of P 1 admission interview process"
3) Give some examples that I do think is "unethical" in their practice or "inconsistencies"
a) "Loving" principal avoid to admit the "administration mistakes" e.g. releasing of results before the completion of interview process and telling "lies" on their administrative incompencies....
b) "Elite" types of principal was selling his books at the interview day and their staff was encouraging the parents who were waiting for their kids to buy the book and asked the principal to sign the book...
c) "Visionable" type of principal was selling their vision by not revealing the uncertainties or realities of IB curriculum to their "die hard fans" - there was no obvious lies, but concealing or keeping silence may be fatal as well!!
d) "Loving and caring principal" did not stopped unfair admission procedures, even encouraging "discriminative knocking door" practices to fulfill his own "pride" or "ignorance"
What do you think....do you think these leaders needs training in "educational ethics" or "self-understanding" courses again???? So that they are more aware of themselves; more aware that they "mission" and "vision" or "love and caring hearts" does not help, but also damaging their school reputations as well as damaging the parents and students...
It's not about "religious" or "non-religious", BUT
If someone is using "religion" to see himself/herself as loving and "perfect", then to cover their "mistakes" with religious principles of love and care, then they are