St. Cat, 簡直不知所謂! [複製鏈接]

StellaBB 寫道:
The following were what we experienced during the interview at SC.

There are 2 merits; 1) The interview arrangement is very good, our kid waited only about 10 minutes before the interview.  It means their system or top management is very good at big project.  2) The assistants are, in general, very nice to the kids and parents. Eg: Open to questions, Willing to show us around, helping kids go up and down.

Ok, now are the 8 SINS; 1) Staff are rude at the gate; shouting impolitely for the entrance reason on me(will they be polite to kids when they are not with parents? ), 2) Teacher requested our kid to stay in line for the interview without questioning why the kid wants to wandering around. (My kid was checking why another baby was crying and wanted to comfort him), 3) Teacher showed no interests/patients to answer my kid's questions (Noise in next room, and my kid asked her what was happening.  The teacher didn't answer my kid's question even my kid keeps on asking for 2-3 times, 4) 2 out of 3 teachers were BLACK-FACE in the interview room all the time, 5) Not interested in listening to my answer to her questions on how to teach my kid, 6) Teacher didn't tell me (understand?) SC's teaching policy and methodology when I questioned, 7) When I walk around, I noticed kids cannot flush the toilet (old design with the long string).  When I ask the assistant, she told me they will do the flushing for the kids - what a kind consideration to avoid kids from playing with the string! (Do you want your kid to pee without flushing by himself? Just like a lot of maids like to feed the kid instead of letting the kid to learn because they don't want to clean up the mess afterwards), 8) When my kid played with their toys in the playground, he was stopped by the teacher because of the reason that they were not responsible for any liability (I thought the safety not the liability is the top priority???)