用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 St Paul's Boy VS 高主教
查看: 6685|回覆: 47
go

St Paul's Boy VS 高主教 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 2


57
1#
發表於 06-12-4 21:11 |只看該作者

St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

兩間都收左, 你地會選邊間? 請指教!

Rank: 1


10
2#
發表於 06-12-4 21:28 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

st. paul's boy just because it's famous comparatively.

Rank: 1


27
3#
發表於 06-12-4 22:45 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

I prefer St Paul's boy  than other one.  

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6160
4#
發表於 06-12-5 00:00 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

Me too, sent withdrawal letter to RC today.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


487
5#
發表於 06-12-5 08:51 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

Me three
I sent the withdrawal letter to RC last week.

Rank: 2


57
6#
發表於 06-12-5 12:22 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

高主教用全普通話及英文,語言環境唔係好d咩?St. Paul 要到四年級先轉全普通話,好似遲左小小!

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5315
7#
發表於 06-12-5 12:27 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

islandmama 寫道:
高主教用全普通話及英文,語言環境唔係好d咩?St. Paul 要到四年級先轉全普通話,好似遲左小小!


St. Paul而家用漸進式, 唔洗d學生咁辛苦.  小一至小三既普通話科加左料, 深過以前, 等d拼音基礎打得好d, 小四既中文科就完全用哂普通話.

Rank: 2


37
8#
發表於 06-12-5 13:23 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

I also sent a withdrawal letter to RC this week.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1316
9#
發表於 06-12-5 16:15 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

快樂媽咪 寫道:
I also sent a withdrawal letter to RC this week.


I even didn't registered at RC although at that time we had not yet received the acceptance letter from St. Paul.  It was because the class size of RC is too large 1:40+    (pls correct me if I'm wrong)

Rank: 3Rank: 3


390
10#
發表於 06-12-5 23:56 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

islandmama 寫道:
兩間都收左, 你地會選邊間? 請指教!


congrats!  i think both are good, this is why so many people like to compare the two and parents find it hard to pick one but in BK you'll see many people prefer Paul Boys.  i personally think that 入任何一間都值得開心!

my personal view is that you may have to collect more info (factual issues) by yourself to make a choice which you think "best fit" your son.

here are some:

- re academic performance, Raimondi should be higher; i got this from atnext forum:

問: 就升中及公開試成績,請比較高主教和聖保羅男小,謝謝。
by Bach (2006-12-01 11:08)  
答: 高主教小學和聖保羅書院小學皆直屬傳統名校,基本上直升比例甚高,兩者都是好選擇,至於兩間中學近年的公開試成績以高主教書院較佳。  

http://education.atnext.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=SpecialistMailbox.QnA&categoryID=TEACHERS&pageNumber=6

問: 家住港島區, 請問慈幼/蘇浙/高主教/培正小學哪一間較好?
by yinma (2006-11-28 12:47)  
答: 我們的意見:高主教>慈幼=蘇浙=培正。高主教書院小學部是十分理想的選擇,校風和成績都甚佳,傳統教會名校高主教書院留給小學部的直屬位甚多,基本上入讀可稱無憂。認識在高主教讀書的學生,都很有禮貌和低調,我們認為那是比較好的選擇。提提你高主教書院小學部短期內會搬到灣仔現聖瑪加利中學校址,而現小學部校址則供中學部擴充之用,不過兩者關係不變。  

http://education.atnext.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=SpecialistMailbox.QnA&categoryID=TEACHERS&pageNumber=11

- however re popularity / degree of fame, St Paul Boys is higher among non-Catholics (因為好多人知有 Paul Co-ed - 勁,以為 oh, there is also one St Paul which is a boys' school,成為左宣傳,哈哈) and at least true in BK;

- you may also consider the following factors:

e.g. Paul Boys is "through train" but Raimondi is not.  I believe this is why Paul Boys is more popular; if parents got both, it's likely that they will give up Raimondi;

re School address, Raimondi will move to wanchai and Paul Boys will move to the southern part near Chifu;

re class size, Raimondi currently uses traditional approach and as large as 30-40 which is not so preferred by parents who love DSS.  Paul Boys uses activity-approach and only 30 a class.  One of the selling point for most DSS nowdays is "small-class teaching", which I think maybe a good thing for education at kinder / primary levels.

Rank: 4

醒目開學勳章


543
11#
發表於 06-12-6 00:08 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

有冇人知ST. Paul Boys有多少位?每年又有多小人申請呢?想知道是否難入?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


5315
12#
發表於 06-12-6 00:19 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

有冇人知ST. Paul Boys有多少位?
=> 30/class, 3 classes, so 90 seats

每年又有多小人申請呢?想知道是否難入?
=> around 7:1

Rank: 1


27
13#
發表於 06-12-6 00:23 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

only90 seats;over 900  kids apply

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3610
14#
發表於 06-12-6 09:21 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

morris_mama 寫道:

- however re popularity / degree of fame, St Paul Boys is higher among non-Catholics (因為好多人知有 Paul Co-ed - 勁,以為 oh, there is also one St Paul which is a boys' school,成為左宣傳,哈哈) and at least true in BK;


有點不公平 : St Paul Co-ed 的前身是St Paul's College, 分家後才出現一間男女校, 一間男校.  

Rank: 3Rank: 3


487
15#
發表於 06-12-6 09:26 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

Firstly, I think the comment from 壹蘋果網絡 is NOT really reliable that those answers have strong bias against the traditional famous schools.

Take an example:  
問:那些學校面試時比較看家境? 拔萃男小,喇沙....。因不想看那些老師的白眼。by Pinkey (2006-08-15 12:30)
答:我們只說親身或認識的人曾遇上不快經驗的學校,道聽途說的不講:拔萃男書院附屬小學、拔萃女小學、聖保羅男女(堅尼地道)小學、聖保羅男女(麥當勞道)小學和聖保羅書院小學。可能我們窮人的確是不應該「高攀」他們的,不過一進門就問「坐甚麼車來?」、「屋企有幾多個雪櫃?」等等,我們也不欲把子女交給有這種心態的人教。
http://education.atnext.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=SpecialistMailbox.QnA&categoryID=TEACHERS&pageNumber=114

I just curious to know that who do not want to get in SPCC/DBSPD/DGS/SPCPD once apply. The answer just give me the feeling of "吃不到的葡萄是酸的".  

The parents use their feet to vote.   


Rank: 3Rank: 3


390
16#
發表於 06-12-6 10:42 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

pumbaa 寫道:
Firstly, I think the comment from 壹蘋果網絡 is NOT really reliable that those answers have strong bias against the traditional famous schools.


算啦,呢個社會係甘架 bor,吾同人有吾同價值觀,看同一個世界,人人有不同看法。

我都覺得壹學堂吾係權威,講既野係“有實”有“不儘實”甘啦。quote 出來,係想帶出一個point:一個 coin 永遠都有兩面。呢度有人甘講,第二度又有人甘講。

至於點解會有人甘講呢?我地係成年人,我地應該有足夠的判斷能力去分別是非黑白嘛。


Just a sharing, 有何得罪左,見諒。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


487
17#
發表於 06-12-6 11:06 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

Hi Morris-mama,

Just a sharing too.

I find that 壹蘋果網絡 has a lot of different so-called experts and their answers are quite funny and keep changing.

For example, they claim that St. Francis is better than 瑪利曼, 聖保祿 & 聖心 in terms of academic result???

I personally do think BK's information is more reliable.

Rank: 4

醒目開學勳章


543
18#
發表於 06-12-6 14:16 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

Thanks Teresa.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


390
19#
發表於 06-12-6 14:38 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

pumbaa 寫道:
I personally do think BK's information is more reliable.


Oh really?!  Yea... it could be... afterall, all the comments here are from the "customers'" point of view.

yeah... thanks  

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3693
20#
發表於 06-12-6 21:29 |只看該作者

Re: St Paul's Boy VS 高主教

e.g. Paul Boys is "through train" but Raimondi is not.  I believe this is why Paul Boys is more popular; if parents got both, it's likely that they will give up Raimondi;

re School address, Raimondi will move to wanchai and Paul Boys will move to the southern part near Chifu;

Paul Boys uses activity-approach ....



when does it become paul boy? not very nice.

st. paul boys is not a through train,

there is difference between anglican school and catholic school.

‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖