- 在線時間
- 761 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-9-25
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 4789
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 11-12-6
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2733
- 主題
- 21
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 7522
- UID
- 839657
|
本帖最後由 cellon 於 12-7-28 00:37 編輯
RoseInPink 發表於 12-7-27 23:42
Well, mr/mrs Cellon, Did Mrs lau promise the dgjs students attending the same talk that all would be accepted without fail? Perhaps you may be in a better position to confirm this, i would be grateful if you can promise us a validated answer. Please read my post carefully, it's merely a factual statement that " there is no guarantine that there is 100% entrance to secondary" , not denying that there could be a 100% entrance afterall, as the sec school is now in a better position to select students and admit those it wanted, including dgjs students and giving grace as needed. The rest of the paragraph is MY personal comments and opinions based on my own experiences in the present and past dgjs/dgs, please do not link them to Mrs. Lau talk . If you disagree with my observation, then prove me wrong, like not enlisting your child in any eca/sports/music and obtain 1 or 2 lousy grade, then perhaps you can proceed to Dgs? Oops, Is your child in pri 5/6 already?..
As stated in the PSP, DGS is the "Through-train Secondary School" of DGJS. Do you know what does it mean?
By the way, you stated that "There is no guarantine that it is 100% entrance to secondary,communicated by Stella in the nov/Dec 2011 secondary admission talk in the school hall last year ... Dgjs girls were interviewed and unsuitable ones will be rejected to make way for top students of other schools", can you prove your statement?
By the way, is your daughter studying in DGJS or Good Hope?
|
|