關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較
發新帖
查看: 3919|回覆: 19
go

入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 2


31
1#
發表於 07-6-11 13:23 |只看該作者

入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

本人與心理學家傾談後,發現原來本人兒子適合就讀BAND 2,但本不想,請問有什麼看法

Rank: 3Rank: 3


487
2#
發表於 07-6-11 13:29 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

Band 1 in TaiPo =/= Band 1 in Wanchai

Why don't you share with us what he says?

  

Rank: 2


31
3#
發表於 07-6-11 13:34 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

因他說將來社會不是以分數定高低,而是注重頭腦,所以,不應以讀書為重

Rank: 2


73
4#
發表於 07-6-11 13:35 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

Really want to know how to determine a kid is more suitable to which band.  Hope you can share ...

Rank: 3Rank: 3


103
5#
發表於 07-6-11 13:43 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam:

請不要介意我的意見,無意挑战該心理學家的見解。

似乎這是我第一次聽這樣的評論,某些學生適合band2,某些學生適合band1;一般的説法是,一些學生適合传統教學法的學校,一些學生適合多元化學校,等等;最重要是在band1中,也有不同類型的學校。不知該心理學家的詳細見解是什么?!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


103
6#
發表於 07-6-11 13:48 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

分數定高低不等于頭腦好,對!!
但....
band1著重讀書或分數,也不等于頭腦不好!
similarly
band12不著重分數,也不等于頭腦好!

我只是好奇他/她的分析,勿怪!
lucialam 寫道:
因他說將來社會不是以分數定高低,而是注重頭腦,所以,不應以讀書為重

Rank: 4


835
7#
發表於 07-6-11 14:02 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam 寫道:
因他說將來社會不是以分數定高低,而是注重頭腦,所以,不應以讀書為重

我覺得佢講o既野唔太岩, 你一出黎做野就已經睇成績黎分啦
如果分數唔高, 但頭腦好, 比你有得升職, 但升到一個程度就升唔到嫁啦

Rank: 2


31
8#
發表於 07-6-11 14:40 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

他的意思是不要於小學階段,給他太大壓力,

Rank: 2


31
9#
發表於 07-6-11 14:43 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

因BAND 2功課不是太多,可以做他事,如研究,如一位中五學生不用讀完中五,便可讀大學,因研究成勁

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4747
10#
發表於 07-6-11 14:50 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam 寫道:
因BAND 2功課不是太多,可以做他事,如研究,如一位中五學生不用讀完中五,便可讀大學,因研究成勁


There is banding only for P.6 students, which band 2 schools are you referring to?  Primary or secondary?  How come BAND 2功課不是太多??  If then, Band 3 schools have even less homework??  Not logical at all!!

Rank: 2


31
11#
發表於 07-6-11 14:59 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

BAND 2功課少一些,從朋友得知

Rank: 2


32
12#
發表於 07-6-11 15:38 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam,
Whoever that specialist you were talking to, he is merely making a generalisation. All schools are different, even amongst Band 1 schools.
Many not-so-famous schools are also very aggressive in earning fame or "name". Especially Band 2 schools because it might be just one small step for them to get into the "Band 1 ranking". So many of these school can also be pushing hard so that their students would have better results in public exams like HKCEE. With better results, they can attract more band 1 students, thus making them a so-called Band 1 school.
BTW, I thought only students are ranked by banding, not the school? Or is my understanding wrong?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


180
13#
發表於 07-6-11 15:50 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

Pelican 寫道:
lucialam,
Whoever that specialist you were talking to, he is merely making a generalisation. All schools are different, even amongst Band 1 schools.
Many not-so-famous schools are also very aggressive in earning fame or "name". Especially Band 2 schools because it might be just one small step for them to get into the "Band 1 ranking". So many of these school can also be pushing hard so that their students would have better results in public exams like HKCEE. With better results, they can attract more band 1 students, thus making them a so-called Band 1 school.
BTW, I thought only students are ranked by banding, not the school? Or is my understanding wrong?


Do you think that the initiator of this thread is serious, or is she just having some fun?

Rank: 2


32
14#
發表於 07-6-11 15:55 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

anxiousparent 寫道:
Do you think that the initiator of this thread is serious, or is she just having some fun?


Honestly, I do not know. But may be some other serious parents might have similar questions. So I do not mind using up some of my time typing up a reply.  

Rank: 3Rank: 3


180
15#
發表於 07-6-11 16:00 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

Pelican 寫道:
[quote]
anxiousparent 寫道:
Do you think that the initiator of this thread is serious, or is she just having some fun?


Honestly, I do not know. But may be some other serious parents might have similar questions. So I do not mind using up some of my time typing up a reply.   [/quote]

Other parents, perhaps.  But probably not this one.  Look at his/her other posts.   Scared me to death.

Rank: 4


835
16#
發表於 07-6-11 16:00 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

del

Rank: 4

醒目開學勳章


665
17#
發表於 07-6-11 16:06 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam 寫道:
因BAND 2功課不是太多,可以做他事,如研究,如一位中五學生不用讀完中五,便可讀大學,因研究成勁


If you are serious, pls make sure U know what is the meaning of 'banding', band 幾唔係以功課和教學模式分

Rank: 1


30
18#
發表於 07-6-14 16:00 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

lucialam:

究竟你有冇諗過想個仔點,一時又話教會學校,一時又搵心理專家,係咪太誇張? 細路仔,唔駛過份緊張,我睇你post真係R晒頭!
bk閒人

Rank: 4


662
19#
發表於 07-6-15 13:59 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

請問從什麼地方可得知每間學校是Band1 or Band2?

Rank: 3Rank: 3


294
20#
發表於 07-6-15 14:33 |只看該作者

Re: 入BAND 1與BAND 2學校的比較

1.  香港小學是沒有分BANDING 喎. 只有學生分 BANDING

2.  不知您是否指  % 多 去 BAND  2 中學 就是 BAND 2 小學

3.  如是 !   就不明白為何要這樣選校啦. 實在言之過早 . 如果小朋友 真的是 BAND 2  學生. 將來就會自自然派了去 BAND 2 中學 .   

4. 如果不是 . 咁您是否指 傳統 VS 活動  學校 .  (要明白 多 BAND 1  學生  未必 = 傳統學校.  相反也是一樣)

5. 現行 香港 小一 至小 三 多數也叫做活動教學 .  但上了 小4  之後 又點 會唔 谷呀 !!!!!    除非您讀國際學校.  否則大部份學校都係一樣.

6. 適當的功課量默書是可以幫助學生.  如果小朋友在做功課上出現問題.  應該要對症下藥.   

7  香港讀書好難不下苦功.  看您想先甜後苦. OR  跟應潮流循序漸進 .   

8. 不要想太多了.  如果您怕傳統學校扼殺您兒子的時間, 那麼就選擇一些非傳統名校已經足夠 .


(木不啄不成器. 不要太早保護小朋友. 否則他們的路會很難行. )
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖