- 在線時間
- 54 小時
- 最後登錄
- 12-6-15
- 國民生產力
- 83
- 附加生產力
- 6
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-8-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2235
- 主題
- 31
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2324
- UID
- 29187
 
|
Highly sensitive person
Following is a summary of the new book from the author who coined the phrase "highly sensitive person." Apparently this term (HSP) came from Carl Jung (楊格-與佛洛伊德齊名的心理分析學鼻祖)'s original theory and might not be scientifically valid.
AUTHOR: Aron,-Elaine-N
TITLE: Revisiting Jung's concept of innate sensitiveness.
PUBLICATION YEAR: 2004
ABSTRACT: Jung suggested that innate sensitiveness predisposes some individuals to be particularly affected by negative childhood experiences, so that later, when under pressure to adapt to some challenge, they retreat into infantile fantasies based on those experiences and become neurotic. Indeed, this probably innate tendency is found in about twenty percent of humans, and, in a sense, in most species, in that about this percentage will evidence a strategy of thoroughly processing information before taking action, while the majority depend on efficient, rapid motor activity. Given this thorough processing, sensitive individuals readily detect subtleties--including whatever is distressing or threatening. Hence, as Jung observed, given the same degree of stress in childhood as nonsensitive individuals, sensitive persons will develop more depression, anxiety, and shyness. Without undue stress, they evidence no more of these difficulties than the non-sensitive-- or even less, being unusually aware of supportive as well as negative cues from caregivers. Given this interaction, one treatment task is to distinguish the effects of such childhood difficulties from what does not need treatment, which are the typical effects of the trait itself on an adult without a troubled developmental history.
***
To Faith:
Your topic is far too interesting and I can't help throwing away all my other work and findi out what exactly is HSP. My opinion is it is a term invented by a social psychologist based on psychoanalytic theory (Jung). I think it'd be more helpful to explain a child's problem through using commonly understood terms.
[問題1﹕我的孩子除了數學方面較突出...但他好像卻沒有很多gifted的特徵...又有冇一些數學能力超前如my son但結果不是gifted 呢?]
I think human brain functions in a mysterious way. It's not uncommon (especially in the university setting) to find people who are only specialize in their own areas but know nothing about the outside world. Their social life is a mess (but some of them manage to get married!) Also your son might just be too young to show his other talents as he's only 3+years old!
[問題2,如果到他五六歲時,咬字發音仍不清,會否很難做iq test?可怎辦?]
3 years are a long time. With suitable training it shouldn't be a problem. Kids improve VERY quickly!
[問題3,咬字發音問題和腦部缺損有關嗎?會自己好嗎?]
I might not be the best person to answer this question as I'm not a ST. But I think it's more likely due to insufficient use of vocal muscle (STs forgive me for using the wrong term) than actual brain damage.
[問題4,他學琴也很快,才學不到四個月便可以彈貝多芬的給愛麗絲了,只是彈得不太好聽而已,但他真的"曾"很愛彈琴,。他視譜能力以3歲多的孩子來說真的很不錯了。音樂是右腦,數學是左腦,會否增加了他的情緒矛盾?音樂才能是否無法用iqtest?]
The left/right brain division is only a myth. In real life both side compensate each other. Einstein was a good example (he's maths wizard and also an avid violin (?) player.)
Faith, I know that at times parents want to find an answer for their children's "problems" but most of the time it's impossible. I once met parents kept pressing me to label their son as autistic as they could not explain his behaviour. I don't think label is very useful, especially for terms like HSP (for reason I explained in the beginning). It's not really a scientific term but a left over from an old psychoanalytic theory. |
|