- 在線時間
- 150 小時
- 最後登錄
- 18-9-13
- 國民生產力
- 6
- 附加生產力
- 1326
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-4-22
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 246
- 主題
- 5
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1578
- UID
- 134097
 
|
Mrs. Hamster,
After visiting SIS's Open House in April 2010, I dropped all other "lovers" because there was only one - THE ONE in my eyes --- SIS.
I knew very well that the interview would be conducted in Eng or Mandarin, and of cos' we are a HK family and won't choose Mandarin. I therefore determined to let my son study in Small World Christian School starting from Sept 2010 in PM to equip him with the Eng ability for the interview, and to remain in Rhenish Mission School in AM ---- just in case he was not selected by SIS, we still would have options of going to the IS or traditional streams....
Before studying in Small World, my son could only speak Eng words / phrases, not complete sentences. However, after studying for 2 months in SW, my son started to speak complete sentences.
On an afternoon in late Oct 2010, i.e. about 2 months after studying in SW, I played with my son in the Peak's playground. There were some birds and there was some bread in my son's hand. He suddenly said "Daddy, let's drop the bread and let the birds eat it."
I was totally awe-struck by his super great improvement in Eng after studying in SW. It tells how important a language environment is to a child's learning of languages.
Considering SIS would use only Eng / Mandarin from PY1 and seeing the students' awesome Eng / Mandarin / IT competence during the Open House, I and my wife then started to fall in love with SIS. No other schools could lure us away...
About the interview, my son is not a native speaker and according to my observation, about 60-70 % of those attending the interview were native Eng speakers. Therefore, you may say my son would suffer some disadvantage if only language speaking skill was assessed. However, thanks to the training in SW, my son could fully understand conversational Eng and express himself quite well in Eng. Overall speaking, I guess my son would be "average" among all those candidates in terms of spoken English.
Since we could not witness how the interview was conducted, I had to rely on my son telling me what had happened during the 30 mins of interview.
He said - the teacher would say "Circle, triangle, circle, triangle, then what's next?"
According to my son, he could answer :Circle.
Another 'test', according to the decriptions" of my son would be like--- The teacher would ask the candidates -- a group of 4 or 5 to throw a dice on its six faces were figures like -- square / star / triangle .... and if the face shows star... the kid would be required to put 'something' onto 'somehwere' with a star....
So, overall speaking, so long as the kid could communicate in Eng, I think it would be OK... and from the games, you would note that SIS would assess a kid's logical sense / IQ / or maybe motivation to participate etc...
So, I think what made my son stand out and selected would not be his spoken English (which was average), but his logical sense etc.....
Hope the above information could help!
[ 本帖最後由 ikerberg 於 11-2-9 20:07 編輯 ] |
|