有冇華人家長没有讓小朋友學繁體字

lawsonmoon

有冇華人家長没有讓小朋友學繁體字

JTmom

學校裏只學簡體字的小朋友也不少。主要看家長對繁體字的看法。

happy-kid

原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 12-12-04 發表
有冇華人家長没有讓小朋友學繁體字

Me.

PCMW

happy-kid 發表於 12-12-5 17:50
Me.

Me 2.

minirat

My boy has yet to reach that stage, but if his future school teaches simplified Chinese, I won't mind, coz I learnt simplified Chinese myself.

annie40

哗! 中文已经是好唔掂, 唯有是学得多少是多少!  仲有得選择餐单吗? 吃得下的, 我会挑全餐!

Mighty

完全賛成ANNIE４０説的。　不過我可能明白o林羅生門o林MAAK,因為我都経歴過這個階段、好想小朋友学識繁体字、但結果一年左右放棄了。　　我不敢説IMPOSSIBLE,因有人是OK的、但我家小朋友、在学校是「普教簡」、対中文的興趣不大、肯讀好簡体字、我ALREADY　VERY　HAPPY　LA.　只要識中文、簡体都OK了。　小鄧説、白猫、黒猫、捉到老鼠的都是好猫！！

minirat

Mighty 發表於 12-12-12 13:10
完全賛成ANNIE４０説的。　不過我可能明白o林羅生門o林MAAK,因為我都経歴過這個階段、好想小朋友学識繁体字 ...

好贊成。我見好多家長堅持小朋友學繁體字。
其實我唸每個人都會贊成繁體字靚好多，有意思好多。
不過如果想小朋友（某部份的小朋友，尤其是第一語言不是中文的朋友）易上手，培養對中文的興趣，讀簡體字又未嘗不可。
我自己由細讀簡體字，不過我讀繁體字一樣無問題。
雖然我唔識寫繁體，不過並不影響生活。

elmostoney

老大學簡體, 因為同學校一致. 佢對中文興趣麻麻, 我唔想再要佢同時適應兩套, 不過我教時, 都會寫出繁體比佢對照一下.

老二同一間學校, 但佢中文底子好好多, 所以我係屋企照教繁體.

我覺得最重要係因材施教, 唔好因為一己對繁體感情而影響小朋友學習進度同興趣.  學左簡體, 係香港生活, 我相信都會有足夠能力睇餐牌, 路牌呢d, 可能會覺得睇繁體書吃力.  反而我覺得小朋友如能對中文有興趣, 如某本書只得繁體, 就算佢本來只識簡體, 都會努力睇, 好似個d大6人咁, 睇d高官秘聞, 都要睇繁體啦!  所以the point is building up their interest,而唔係繁簡體問題.  好多 IS 學生, 係d中文好嘅 IS 讀,但係對中文冇興趣, 平時唔睇課外書, 更唔會主動寫中文, 一離開校j園, 中文十級而下, 我都見過唔少.

aheihei

十分認同，培養對中文字的興趣比較重要！繁體或簡體是其次！

annie40

回復 Annie123 的帖子

哈哈! 跟大家说学得多少是多少是跟家长说的, 因为深明个中难处, 我们是在跟时间竞赛, 等不及了, 只能珍惜每个机会!  

自己跟孩子说的一套是金庸写的是通俗小说, 未算入流, (老师也是这种说法), 张爱玲又过于感性, (我觉得闷), 看得通易经,荘子, 才叫做有点睇头, 吓! 要求高? 人家美国人Howard Goldblatt 已翻译了不少中国作品, 外国人学中文仲比我们更多关卡, 真是有志竟成啊!

把孩子的想象蓝图画得大, 看他们如何把有限的生命, 来成就无限的事物.  凡事始于立志!  没有志气,是等运到吗?

Alvinhu

金庸的小说很好，我有一个ABC朋友，读完全套，中文就差不多会了

FattyDaddy

The problem with Chinese characters is, it is completely detached from spoken Chinese. One can learn how to write Mandarin without knowing how to speak Mandarin (like many Hongkongers), and one can learn how to speak Mandarin without knowing how to write Mandarin (like many gweilos). Unlike an alphabetic language where the written form is just a phonetic representation of the spoken sounds, Chinese characters are logograms which must be memorized, there is no easy way round it.

Of course, if one invests enough time, one can memorize both sets of traditional and simplified characters, but life is short, so unless there are strong underlying cultural or political convictions, the rational choice would be simplified Chinese. Yes it may be crude, it may be ugly, but it is easier to remember because there are less strokes, and it would take less time to learn. I'm sure many "traditional" Japanese must have frowned too when their Kanji was simplified, but simplified they did.