- 在線時間
- 148 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-4-5
- 國民生產力
- 26
- 附加生產力
- 1613
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-10-30
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1209
- 主題
- 42
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2848
- UID
- 674229
|
本帖最後由 motherotk 於 12-3-24 10:40 編輯
I used to work in a secondary school few years ago regularly, and made friends with some students and teachers there. I had this experience:
This is a band 3 school, and most students came from low-income families with parents fully occupied with their works. These kids could not have follow the learning partly because of lack of guidance and supervision. But the teachers were really good, they understand those kids and tried their best to offer postive environment and motivation to keep these kids in school. Yet, still a lots of kids dropped out of school.
One kid was a new immigrant at Form One, no parental support, and with very basic englihs training, but was a smart kid. At Form three, he applied QC as a tranferral student, he was admitted. All done by himself. As far as I know, this kid was not sport talented, or music talented as his family was not well-off enough to support him. But he was a self-driven kid and he wrote his own letter to apply for the transfer.
This is a case study as well, no statisitically significant, as most of the information posed at EK, this story poses an alternative perspective on how to admit to good schools..
My point is: Never over-estimate or under-estimate your kid's potential if you do understand the kid really well, irrespective where you come from, and pick the school that will offer you opportunities, try to impress them on your point
|
|