St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen [複製鏈接]

cfanny 寫道:
heard from a friend, about 85% (4.5classes)F.1 students of St. Joseph's Secondary are from St.Jo Primary. They have 200+ (5 classes)students in F1. Don't know how many students in Primary section. The secondary school is willing to accept their own students from primary school. And the kids can also be happy in learning if their parents are not too demanding. The academic level is undoubtably very high esp. compare with schools in the same district.

St. Paul's Boy, it's more famous since it has become a DSS school and can select their own students. The moral edu is very gd in this school.

St. Stephen's College, many parents have many +ve comments here.Though the academic level may not be as high as St.Jo, it must be a very gd school and provide a gd learning atmosphere to students.

LLT 寫道:
[quote]
cfanny 寫道:
Don't know how many students in Primary section.

FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
cfanny 寫道:
heard from a friend, about 85% (4.5classes)F.1 students of St. Joseph's Secondary are from St.Jo Primary. They have 200+ (5 classes)students in F1. Don't know how many students in Primary section. The secondary school is willing to accept their own students from primary school. And the kids can also be happy in learning if their parents are not too demanding. The academic level is undoubtably very high esp. compare with schools in the same district.

St. Paul's Boy, it's more famous since it has become a DSS school and can select their own students. The moral edu is very gd in this school.

St. Stephen's College, many parents have many +ve comments here.Though the academic level may not be as high as St.Jo, it must be a very gd school and provide a gd learning atmosphere to students.

Leechi 寫道:


聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

cfanny 寫道:
[quote]
Leechi 寫道:


聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

Leechi 寫道:
cfanny,

Agree with you, St. Stephen 之所以出名是學校環境好, 沒有壓力, 英文普通話教學, 學費貴,型成貴族小學, 入得去讀家底有番咁上下.至於中學成績好似冇其他幾間咁勁!

Leechi 寫道:
Fung12345,

聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

ssspwong 寫道:
[quote]
Leechi 寫道:
cfanny,

Agree with you, St. Stephen 之所以出名是學校環境好, 沒有壓力, 英文普通話教學, 學費貴,型成貴族小學, 入得去讀家底有番咁上下.至於中學成績好似冇其他幾間咁勁!

FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
po.mummy 寫道:
FUNG12345寫道:

雖然佢踢走d差o既, 但問題係佢收番o既人都唔少
而收番o既可以講係好好, 所以佢整體應該唔會差得去邊
咁你都係冇可能証明佢教學好唔好, 根本係冇得討論
所以冇可能話佢is not good at training up students

而你話成績好果d唔會揀st jo, 我覺得一定唔係
至少st jo唔比qc差, 好過華仁好多

最後, 揀st jo 定揀St Stephen
就各有各唔同喜好


你好似好熟好清楚 st jo校內既情况咁喎！奇啦！我所知,你好似係所謂深水涉既英華學生家長架咋喎！你又唔係st jo家長,你又唔係華仁 同QC學生, 咁醒? 咁有邏輯思維..?? 你當BK家長白痴架….!我又真係好想知,係唔係st jo年年全級考頭果幾個學生,家長講比你知,佢地年年同你講,佢地一定揀番 st jo 呢！知唔知醜架你…而你又好似好熟好清楚 華仁 同QC 校內既情况咁喎?而你既邏輯思維又覺得st jo唔比QC差, 好過華仁好多? 咁醒? 敢問唔比QC有幾差, 好過華仁又有幾多呢…..哈！狗屁不通 你點解會咁低能,以為買一本明報升中選校全攻略,完全照讀照講,估估下,就可以嘻BK大大聲扮識野.,噏得出就噏…作得就作, FUNG12345呢位深水涉英華廢校家長, 你冇野呀? <<明報升中選校全攻略>> 你係唔係當所有BK家長個個白痴唔識野架華….!…………睇醫生啦………..!

                                                            :-)  :-) [size=medium]廢校家長 :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)

FUNG12345 寫道:

麟媽媽 寫道:
中學唔係比晒D 位比小學架，怕無你地想像中咁多喎。
其實升中直屬額係有得計既，
間間學額數量唔同，亦視乎中/小學生之比例。

舉例 (1)︰
St. Jo 中學F.1 有5 班
5班x 40人 = 200個位
扣除自行20% 收生 = 40個位
扣除5% 留班額 = 10個位
剩下學額 = 150個位
預留直屬比小學 = 150個位 x 85% = 127.5個位
如果St. Jo 小學有8 班約320 人，咁大約40% 入番中學。

cfanny:
ST.Jo primary: 8 classes: (37-40) in a class,300+ students in total

St.Jo Secondary: 5 classes: 40-45 in a class,210 students in total.  85% of their Secondary school students are promoted from primary school.

Therefore,4.5-5 classes(1/2 to  2/3 ) in primary school can be promoted from Primary to secondary.

FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
Leechi 寫道:
Fung12345,

聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

po.mummy 寫道:

以你ge白痴講法. 第1你係學生

[size=medium]係乜水學校學生,係st jo學生,華仁學生,St Stephen學生定係QC學生  如果以上[size=medium]間間學校都唔係 咁你以乜咩嘢正確資料以乜咩嘢邏輯思維以乜咩嘢理據去發表你既[size=medium]白痴意見啞…!

第2你發表你自己白痴既意見關我咩嘢事 ?
[size=medium]你來來去去由朝到黑淨係識講果句<<我就覺得>>覺得…?我就真係覺得你正一頭腦[size=medium]簡單未瞓醒 嘻度作嘢"語無倫次"噏得出就噏,咁就關我事啦廢校學生!

第3, 你唔會回應我,你唔會同d文化水平極低o既癡線佬理論

[size=medium]所謂深水涉英華廢校教出黎 ge學生乜嘢文化乜嘢水平呢?你好可憐啞!

第4, 你唔知英華有咩得罪我,但我話佢廢, 唔該我講下有咩廢

[size=medium]深水涉英華冇得罪我 不過 呢,深水涉廢校英華教出黎 ge學生以作野文化講嘢,可以[size=medium]冇資料可以冇理據可以冇邏輯思維…係度齋講廢話..! 成日淨係識講<<我就覺得>>[size=medium]呢…! 覺得…..? 唔該你話喇..!深水涉英華係唔係廢校一間……呢.!

第5, 你話我成日走出黎嘈, 但你相信冇咩人會理會我,不如做多d有意義o既野啦, 話我好幼稚

[size=medium]話你講嘢估估下話你講嘢完全可以冇理據冇資料可以冇邏輯思維….!.冇人認同你ge講法咁就話人成日走出黎嘈? 真係深水涉廢校學生…..! 我依家咪教你乜[size=medium]嘢係廢校學生講廢話囉..! 有意義架.....哈!..... 睇醫生啦……….. 幼稚…哈!


                    
                      
                      

po.mummy 寫道:
[quote]
FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
Leechi 寫道:
Fung12345,

聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
po.mummy 寫道:
[quote]
FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
Leechi 寫道:
Fung12345,

聽講St Jo 是8斑小學只有3.5斑升上St Jo 中學,是否太冒險?

cfanny 寫道:

Sorry! I think your calculation is not correct. The est.85% is the final calculation for the F1 boys of St.Jo THIS Academic yr. The seats for F1 is normally 210(+-),not 200,the repeaters are only 3-5 students a yr.(normally not more than 5). St.Jo Secondary is very willing to pick their own students from primary school. The fact is that more than one half can promote to secondary.