- 在線時間
- 674 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-3-18
- 國民生產力
- 110
- 附加生產力
- 1641
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-6-7
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1549
- 主題
- 21
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 3300
- UID
- 86537
|
原文章由 lawlinhy 於 07-10-22 18:57 硐表
Besides lower school fee and learning Chinese, is there any more "merits" that CKY have when comparing to ESF?
One shouldn't compare CKY with ESF or other ISs. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
Most would agree IF one is concerned about English standard, he should really go for ISs and the question then becomes which IS is better or more suitable to his kid.
I dare not say CKY has more merits than ESF especially there are even more fans of ESF than those of CKY. I'm sure each camp will tell you their merits. Simply spend some time reading the relevant threads and you would have a grip of their respective merits. Then you'd decide which one suits your kid better.
By the way, I'm not really sure if CKY charges a lower tuition fee - in primary school? On the other hand, ESF has also increased their Chinese lessons. Both CKY and ESF teach Chinese in PTH. In fact, due to their different weightings given to English and Chinese, students of the two schools are reasonably expected to have a different level of command of the two languages. |
|