- 在線時間
- 137 小時
- 最後登錄
- 16-5-23
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 913
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 13-6-14
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 165
- 主題
- 2
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1078
- UID
- 1238160
|
本帖最後由 honeybunny7 於 13-8-26 14:52 編輯
回復 shadeslayer 的帖子
Well, i wouldn't say that's a resounding Yes. I just wanted to confirm that we did hire from HKUST undergrad. I'm not sure if we hire from HKU and CU, but I did interview a handful from HKU though they were not impressive. HKUST has programs that feed well into some sections in banks so the cream of their crops do get selected. It also seems that HKUST in general expose students to more project-based learning.
But, you have to know, the hiring in these past few years have been scarce when compared to the heydays of banking, so the sample size I'm referring to is really small.
In terms of why not or few from HK schools, here are some observations:
- During college years, my friends from HKU and Imperial College used to talk about how hard they must study the past papers of each professor and memorize the answers, because the professors often recycle exam questions. I laughed at such laziness of the professors. At Penn that never happened, learning is through weekly projects, and there's nothing to memorize, as we are all allowed to create our own cheat sheets. US schools want students to learn to apply and manipulate knowledge, not just to memorize them.
- At a top global consulting firm, US-based, undergrads at top US schools are recruited as analysts, but only master degree or PhD degree holders from top EU schools (Cambridge, Oxford, etc.) are considered for analyst posts, with the same pay. Why doesn't the firm hire undergrads from top EU schools? Because students from these schools are considered as lacking the ability to solve problems independently and work in teams. This is probably true to some HK uni.
- Under the HK school systems, which focus so much on marks instead of actual learning, everyone wants to take short-cuts. Relatives working as professors / researchers at HKU / CU / PolyU told me stories how their labs' people would cite each others' papers for NO good reasons just to pump up the "overall citing counts". That's such a shame! During my undergrad years I worked for researchers whose ground-breaking research get cited across the globe, so a small potato like myself could get my name on published papers via hard work. Cutting corners like that is like cheating, to me.
Note that my observations above may be limited, so if you have other ideas please do share.
|
|