- 在線時間
- 2273 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-4-29
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 18891
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-4-19
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2804
- 主題
- 36
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 21695
- UID
- 903799
![Rank: 9](/static/image/common//star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](/static/image/common//star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](/static/image/common//star_level1.gif)
|
回復 NKpa 的帖子
I think starting in LS and then studying abroad can certainly help and can go a long way to address the problems. Having gone through the process myself, I still don't think I am able to transition as much as I want though. If I have a choice to start over at the age of 6, I would choose the path of IS. I don't think there is right or wrong in IS vs LS debate but rather what is the better way for the student to learn and also what educational outcomes are the parents looking for?
I don't think LS "destroys" creativity either but I would think of it as "suppressed." I do see many LS students blossom but this tends to be quite a bit later in the thirties or forties as they try to readjust to different modes of thinking and working. On the other hand, IS students do not have as strong a grounding in some of the basic skills. I suspect the average level of IS students are not as strong in math and science as LS students. But there is a small subset of IS students who find their calling and can be truly brilliant.
|
|