- 在線時間
- 2274 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-10-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 18934
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-4-19
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 2804
- 主題
- 36
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 21738
- UID
- 903799
|
回復 囝囝爸 的帖子
Sorry, it will take me too long to type in Chinese so I will use English instead. The reason I said these famous LS are properties of the school organizing body is to bring up the concept of properties. I am not referring to the physical real estate but rather the concept of ownership and the ability of an owner to operate their properties. And I think we have very different views on that. For me, these schools are effectively private properties even though they provide public services. As private properties, they have their own rights to determine what types of schools they should be, what students they admit, what teachers they hire, what curriculum to teach, .... Even with long standing traditions and even if some of theses schools might not have exercised these rights before, I don't think the government should encroach on these rights. It is not the job of these schools to provide quality education to everyone! Rather, that is the job of the government.
|
|