- 在線時間
- 825 小時
- 最後登錄
- 19-11-16
- 國民生產力
- 12
- 附加生產力
- 7069
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-1-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3280
- 主題
- 9
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 10361
- UID
- 121214
![Rank: 7](/static/image/common//star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 7](/static/image/common//star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 7](/static/image/common//star_level1.gif)
|
Kittybama 發表於 16-11-6 13:48 ![](static/image/common/back.gif)
其實大家用英文學習的時間差不多,為何有些學校可以教到學生英文達1st Lang 程度,而非國際學校只能達2nd L ...
If you are talking about IS vs LS, then it has nothing to do with the the spent on learning English. Rather, the main difference is with design of the curriculum.
Local school is using the local English curriculum which was designed to be at second language level.
So even if you have learnt English from P1 to F6, you have always been learning English as a second language.
Even at local elite schools, they are also following the local curriculum and thus their top students who get 5** in DSE English are only considered to have English at second language level.
On the other hand, students in international schools (most if not all), students will be learning English as a first language. Students that eventually sit for IB English A exams are all considered to have English as first language.
Universities do not judge you with your ethnicity. They look at what exam you write.
|
|