教育王國

標題: 有沒有直資學校的排名？ [打印本頁]

作者: Karen2010 時間: 11-3-1 21:35 標題: 有沒有直資學校的排名？

有沒有直資學校的排名榜？還有，請教各位優才書院VS瑪麗諾/協恩/德望，如何取捨？

作者: honsing 時間: 11-3-8 10:01

我都您知！

作者: angel333 時間: 11-3-8 12:06

我個人會咁排
1.瑪利諾
2.協恩
3.德望
4.優才
你可以參考
http://maths1000.com/
江湖傳聞，2010 HKCEE 協恩及德望成績均明顯下滑！

作者: specialapple 時間: 11-3-8 20:48

1. DGS
2. St Paul Co Edu
3. St Paul Convent

作者: elbar 時間: 11-3-9 12:24

2010 HKCEE Results

部份新直資中學	6科考獲14分比率
中華基金中學	61.10%
保良局羅氏基金中學	56.90%
匯基書院（東九龍）	51.30%
優才(楊殷有娣)書院	50.00%
香港管理專業協會李國寶中學	50.00%
保良局顏寶鈴書院	48.90%

[ 本帖最後由 elbar 於 11-3-9 12:26 編輯 ]

作者: tweetyho 時間: 11-3-9 16:05

1.St Paul co-ed
2.DGS
3.St Paul Convent

作者: tweetyho 時間: 11-3-9 16:06

原帖由 angel333 於 11-3-8 12:06 發表
我個人會咁排
1.瑪利諾
2.協恩
3.德望
4.優才
你可以參考
http://maths1000.com/
江湖傳聞，2010 HKCEE 協恩及德望成績均明顯下滑！

my preference is the same ar...for those girl schools in kln side

[ 本帖最後由 tweetyho 於 11-3-9 16:09 編輯 ]

作者: Chunyan 時間: 11-3-10 13:46

我會咁排
1. 德望
2. 瑪利諾
3.協恩
4.優才

作者: hingmami 時間: 11-3-10 15:48

德望和優才好似前左D喎？協恩的强項是成績？還是運動？小學直升你佢优點？有沒有人給意見？謝謝！

原帖由 Chunyan 於 11-3-10 13:46 發表
我會咁排
1. 德望
2. 瑪利諾
3.協恩
4.優才

作者: angel333 時間: 11-3-10 18:06

原帖由 Chunyan 於 11-3-10 13:46 發表
我會咁排
1. 德望
2. 瑪利諾
3.協恩
4.優才

你睇睇德望嘅升大學資料就知咁排一定錯！
德望唯一優點係英文科成績好。

作者: twinsstar1 時間: 11-3-12 00:01

just last year jie....and you can also check the CE data of that batch of AL students, if their CE results were not that poor, this might be due to the fact that many good students have left ghs to other schools and to overseas after F5

I think the school is just too honest to display all data..

Not tactful enough

Some famous schools actually did not display any of this kind of data to the public so we never know the actual performance of their students , though they have good names and we all assume that they got very good public exam results

Whereas for some, they are very tactful. If you look at how some school display their data, you will understand e.g. some school said she has 80+% of students entered local universities and 20+% of them entered overseas universities. However, this doesnt mean they are all doing degree courses, it can include asso and high-dip courses too. Unless, the school says 80% are doing degree courses in local university or there's a separate % for high-dip/ asso, then the data is reliable.

Of course, there are also some which have displayed many useful data and have very good results la ... e.g.St paul coed, DGS, St Mary

原帖由 angel333 於 11-3-10 18:06 發表

你睇睇德望嘅升大學資料就知咁排一定錯！
德望唯一優點係英文科成績好。

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-12 01:14 編輯 ]

作者: twinsstar1 時間: 11-3-12 00:32

deleted...

[ 本帖最後由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-12 01:28 編輯 ]

作者: twinsstar1 時間: 11-3-12 01:28

中學	2009-2010 HKCEE 6科考獲14分比率
MCS	No data (as no sch report provided)

GHS	85% (from school report)
HYS	69% (From school report)

優才	50% (From BK thread)

but again, guess we won;t just look at exam results when choosing school cos if you purely look at the exam data, I guess the results of many 地區名校are far better than many DSS / traditional elite schools.

原帖由 angel333 於 11-3-8 12:06 發表
我個人會咁排
1.瑪利諾
2.協恩
3.德望
4.優才
你可以參考
http://maths1000.com/
江湖傳聞，2010 HKCEE 協恩及德望成績均明顯下滑！

作者: ChiChiPaPa 時間: 11-3-12 07:22

原帖由 twinsstar1 於 11-3-12 01:28 發表
.....but again, guess we won;t just look at exam results when choosing school cos if you purely look at the exam data, I guess the results of many 地區名校are far better than many DSS / traditional elite schools. ...

選校當然不能只看成績，但我相信不少家長在選校前，沒有或不能取得中學的成續和其它客觀數據，只可憑 hearsay 和校譽去選校。

由於家長可以在不知會考成績的情況下，以主觀因素選校，這使一些中學至今仍沒壓力去增加她們的透明度。

作者: Karen2010 時間: 11-3-16 16:40

那麼，你們選傳統名官/津校（ex:瑪利諾,英華）還是直資名校（ex:DGS，SPCC)呢？為什麼？

[ 本帖最後由 Karen2010 於 11-3-16 16:42 編輯 ]

作者: meimeimama1 時間: 11-3-16 16:59

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)