教育王國
標題: Kellet vs Malvern A LEVEL VS IB [打印本頁]
作者: oliviahehe 時間: 25-9-16 15:08 標題: Kellet vs Malvern A LEVEL VS IB
IB越來越受歡迎,是不是 A LEVEL不值得讀了? 墨爾文和啟曆大家覺得那個更好呢?
作者: supervi 時間: 25-9-18 11:13
兩間都已經有offer 了?
作者: oliviahehe 時間: 7 天前
回覆 supervi 的帖子
墨尔文在读,然后最近收到kellet邮件要开始面试了,没有offer。最近有个身边朋友说A level走下坡路,所以想看看大家的看法
作者: ckmammy 時間: 7 天前
oliviahehe 發表於 25-9-21 07:29 
回覆 supervi 的帖子
墨尔文在读,然后最近收到kellet邮件要开始面试了,没有offer。最近有个身边朋友说A ...
A level 太多人取 A, 甚至 A*, 如果只考慮英國大學都仲有優勢。 其他國家就 IB 會穩陣啲。 不過 IB 要取高分並唔容易。 學校有同學一直讀 IB, 中學成績唔錯, 讀完第一年 IBDP 發現成績上唔到, 即時轉 A level,已經預估好好嘅分數報名英國大學
作者: poonseelai 時間: 7 天前
ckmammy 發表於 25-9-21 10:02 
A level 太多人取 A, 甚至 A*, 如果只考慮英國大學都仲有優勢。 其他國家就 IB 會穩陣啲。 不過 IB 要取高 ...
如果孩子偏理科, 或者未必咁喜歡寫作, A level可能更適合

作者: Radiomama 時間: 7 天前
poonseelai 發表於 25-9-21 16:27 
如果孩子偏理科, 或者未必咁喜歡寫作, A level可能更適合
基本上同意,不過如果孩子仲細,IB 的確可以幫到一啲偏理科的學生發展其presentation, writing and analytics skills; 呢點無論去邊度讀大學都有幫助。
但假如已經是Y10-11, 在IB school好掙扎, 咁轉賽道都係好事。

作者: poonseelai 時間: 7 天前
Radiomama 發表於 25-9-21 18:14 
基本上同意,不過如果孩子仲細,IB 的確可以幫到一啲偏理科的學生發展其presentation, writing and analyt ...
同意呀, ib係好的教育制度, 只係考試模式未必適合所有學生
見到有改革A level討論, 好似話gsce後仍繼續讀math, 嚟緊可能有變化

作者: 964000 時間: 5 天前
Radiomama 發表於 25-9-21 18:14 
基本上同意,不過如果孩子仲細,IB 的確可以幫到一啲偏理科的學生發展其presentation, writing and analyt ...
對,聽過IB畢業的學生話大學仲易過IB時
其實不用太早決定,自細接受IB training 就算最後唔考也畢生受用,香港好多學校有IB得來又會考IGCSE, 考完先轉A level也可以。
迎接未來AI世界,純智識型已經唔夠,communication & presentation skills 好重要。

作者: Poyau 時間: 1 小時前
poonseelai 發表於 25-9-21 19:04 
同意呀, ib係好的教育制度, 只係考試模式未必適合所有學生
見到有改革A level討論, 好似話gsce後仍繼續讀 ...
GCSE Maths 未達 C/4 Standard Pass
A level 要繼續讀 Maths
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/16-to-19-funding-maths-and-english-condition-of-funding/2025-to-2026-academic-year-16-to-19-funding-maths-and-english-condition-of-funding

作者: Poyau 時間: 1 小時前
poonseelai 發表於 25-9-21 19:04 
同意呀, ib係好的教育制度, 只係考試模式未必適合所有學生
見到有改革A level討論, 好似話gsce後仍繼續讀 ...
Record numbers of GCSE results were resits - are we in a 'resit crisis'?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpdj5y98302o.amp
21 August 2025
For almost a quarter of pupils taking Maths and English GCSEs this year, it wasn't their first rodeo. Some 23.4% of pupils taking those exams were aged 17 and older - an all-time high.
While some of those would have been mature students sitting them for the first time, most would have been school- or college-age pupils taking resits after failing them when they were 16.
In England, if a pupil doesn't get a passing grade in GCSE Maths and English the first time around, they need to keep studying for them alongside doing their next course, such as A-levels or T-levels.
These resits are held twice a year, in June and November.
Pupils resitting are far less likely to pass than those sitting the exams for the first time. This year in England, only 20.9% of English entries and 17.1% of Maths entries for pupils aged 17 or older achieved a passing grade - grade 4 - or higher.
······
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |