EconFather 發表於 18-10-4 18:49
公平講，在設施上，香港應該只有幾家國際學校可以和哈羅比較。
ESF | Harrow | ||
| A* / 9-8 | 2018 | 32 / 40 | 66 / 44 |
2017 | 30 | 55 | |
2016 | 27 | 61.0 | |
2015 | 29 | 52.2 | |
| A*-A / 9-7 | 2018 | 58 / 59 | 89.0 / -- |
2017 | 57 | 84.0 | |
2016 | 54 | 85.2 | |
2015 | 55 | 77.1 | |
| A*-B / 9-6 | 2018 | -- / 87 | |
2017 | |||
2016 | 97.5 | ||
2015 | 92.1 | ||
| A*-C / 9-4 | 2018 | 94 / 97 | 99.0 / -- |
2017 | 94 | ||
2016 | 93 | 100.0 | |
2015 | 92 |
EconFather 發表於 18-10-4 18:49
公平講，在設施上，香港應該只有幾家國際學校可以和哈羅比較。
austinmimi 發表於 18-10-4 19:24
請問閣下高見認為係邊幾間呢？
EconFather 發表於 18-10-4 18:49
公平講，在設施上，香港應該只有幾家國際學校可以和哈羅比較。
學校成續直接比較有d唔公平，雖然在絕對值 ...
Academic support is only a part of boarding education, which is multidimensional and puts more emphasis on holistic development, as well as enhancement of other talents such as sports, music, or art and design. No matter whether this can actually be achieved or not, at least this is what boarding education is supposed to be. See
Checking the UK school league tables, I don’t think boarding schools have any advantages in terms of their academic results. Attending a boarding school is not to get extra classes (which are not available anyway) but to have a life-changing experience, while attending a day school allows you to have private tutoring after school time.
Saboc 發表於 18-10-5 07:40
選擇Harrow 定Esf除了價錢問题外，根本两所學校的文化，教學模式同學制完全不同。畢業出來的學生也有分別。 ...
I have a feeling that it is a bit exaggerated to talk about cultural difference between different high schools, especially when we are talking about schools in the same city. At the microscopic scale, we may even talk about the cultural difference between different houses in the same school, but is it something so important?
I am not too sure how many parents are so sufficiently (and correctly) informed that they could be able to use cultural difference as a criterion in choosing schools for their children.
When "School A vs School B" is a question of one's interest, then I will understand that (i) he or she got offers from both schools and (ii) both schools can meet his/her expectation in many but perhaps not the same aspects. When one asked specifically the teachers and facilities, then clearly he would like to compare the classroom teaching and learning, and of course results of the same public exam can fairly reflect the learning outcomes, but this key performance indicator is definitely restricted to one particular aspect only. I am afraid that cost effectiveness and other non-academic matters, though important or even crucial, may be irrelevant to this thread. However, I still thank you for your sharing.
EconFather 發表於 18-10-4 21:53
個人意見 KGV 同 HKIS 在設施上都好好。KGV唔大但佢可以用盡後方球場。
Saboc 發表於 18-10-6 14:16
回覆 mimi613 的帖子
設施無得比
hitommycc 發表於 18-10-6 21:32
個人理解，負擔得到Harrow的家庭應該不會考慮Esf吧？ESF一直是「最高性價比」的代表哦
利申：esf家長
austinmimi 發表於 18-10-7 00:08
依家無政府資助，ESF性價比已經不再了
EconFather 發表於 18-10-6 21:49
雖然游泳係舊，但我覺得唔太影響訓練，前面有球場。哈羅係新，但KGV整體比較古風。整個KGV附近有好多運動 ...
hitommycc 發表於 18-10-7 00:31
插班Y4以上依然有資助。各間學校設施都在持續翻新中，相信幾年內仍算有性價比。
...
964000 發表於 18-10-7 07:56
KGV球場係好靚，但真係好舊，仲用緊我地小時用的木桌。其實而家好多新校（除了商場起那些）都起得好靚，舊 ...
964000 發表於 18-10-7 07:56
KGV球場係好靚，但真係好舊，仲用緊我地小時用的木桌。其實而家好多新校（除了商場起那些）都起得好靚，舊 ...
hitommycc 發表於 18-10-7 12:56
認識幾個在其他IS任教的家長，小孩兩三個，讀esf學費平好多
我仔在ESF小學，不知是否取消資助壓力的關係 ...
964000 發表於 18-10-7 13:23
有競爭有進步，但我最不想見到，IS之間因為競爭大了，被迫要「谷成績」，家長們也得記著毌忘初心。
...
EconFather 發表於 18-10-7 18:46
我個人覺得，學術係可以比較同鬥。但我唔讚成死谷。
國際學校更加要優化投入同產出，令教學效率提升。
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) | Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |
