教育王國
標題: ESF vs other International primary schools? [打印本頁]
作者: arialzsc 時間: 14-7-24 14:59 標題: ESF vs other International primary schools?
A lot of people around me put their kids in ESF schools. I just wonder how is ESF compared to the other international schools, such as Think IS, Kingston?
I haven't decided whether to let my boy enter IS or LS. Technically, would it be possible for him to take part in the Primary school central allocation if he is already admitted in IS after K2?
作者: Jane1983 時間: 14-7-25 22:09
回覆 arialzsc 的帖子
答你最後個問題,讀緊IS都可以大抽獎。
作者: 小之爸 時間: 14-7-26 12:46
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hero_hero 時間: 14-7-26 13:02 標題: 引用:比較學校可以有好多方面,如果以公開試成績
原帖由 小之爸 於 14-07-26 發表
比較學校可以有好多方面,如果以公開試成績來說,ESF整體成績唔算優秀。
如果所讀ESF 今次IB成績25.5 % 40分以上,那不算優秀怎樣才算?

作者: nintendo 時間: 14-7-26 13:39 標題: 回覆:ESF vs other International primary schools?
ESF 唔係精英制,唔會挑選學生入 IB,學生人數很多,好難上去做全港 no 1。但我反而覺得因此更覺得 ESF 的模式係 work 。

作者: lui 時間: 14-7-26 14:01 標題: 引用:ESF+唔係精英制,唔會挑選學生入+IB,學生
原帖由 nintendo 於 14-07-26 發表
ESF 唔係精英制,唔會挑選學生入 IB,學生人數很多,好難上去做全港 no 1。但我反而覺得因此更覺得 ESF 的 ...
我也認同,佢地不分叻唔叻,一齊教,唔似一d學校只著重叻的。結果冇咁叨的完全冇人理死活,死得好慘。

作者: NoahArk 時間: 14-7-26 14:46 標題: 回覆:ESF vs other International primary schools?
我都好喜歡ESF,但為求公道,請問邊間IS叻同唔叻分開教?叧一方面,唔好忘記ESF有兩成多學生冇得考lB。

作者: Jane1983 時間: 14-7-26 15:13
單睇數字,Esf可能吾算最勁果批,但它考生数目多、收生真系有教無類(抽到你,英文掂就收),叻果班學生應該系好top的,甘既成績絶對交到貨!
作者: nintendo 時間: 14-7-26 16:05 標題: 引用:我都好喜歡ESF,但為求公道,請問邊間IS叻
原帖由 NoahArk 於 14-07-26 發表
我都好喜歡ESF,但為求公道,請問邊間IS叻同唔叻分開教?叧一方面,唔好忘記ESF有兩成多學生冇得考lB。
...
唔想又加入口水戰,邊 D 學校有 streaming 大家心裡有數。ESF 學生有叻有唔叻大家亦心裡有數,亦唔係間間有 BTEC。知道ESF運作,就明我講乜。

作者: lui 時間: 14-7-26 18:25 標題: 引用:我都好喜歡ESF,但為求公道,請問邊間IS叻
原帖由 NoahArk 於 14-07-26 發表
我都好喜歡ESF,但為求公道,請問邊間IS叻同唔叻分開教?叧一方面,唔好忘記ESF有兩成多學生冇得考lB。
...
不是20%,around 11-12%

作者: 小之爸 時間: 14-7-26 21:58
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: inamoriizumi 時間: 14-7-26 22:21 標題: 回覆:ESF vs other International primary schools?
For reference.

圖片附件: myphoto.jpg (14-7-26 22:21, 127.64 KB) / 下載次數 31
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=Mjg2MTR8NjcxY2NkYmN8MTc1NTc5NDY5NXww

作者: hero_hero 時間: 14-7-26 23:44 標題: 引用:ESF網頁顯示2014年有20.2%學生取40分以上,
原帖由 小之爸 於 14-07-26 發表
ESF網頁顯示2014年有20.2%學生取40分以上,相比其他IS,唔差。但真係唔算突出。
...
ESF 係一個機構,屬下有很多中學每一間都有不同成績,我不知你用那間國際學校或有參與IB公開試的學校比較,但以ESF 有考生 831個而獲取這樣成績,我覺得巳很優秀,如果抽起這20%最Top的學生。試問全港有那一間學校做到這様出眾的成績。

作者: HappyMH 時間: 14-8-3 00:37
回覆 NoahArk 的帖子
提外話, 點解有2成學生冇得參加IB?
作者: jolalee 時間: 14-8-7 23:24
lui 發表於 14-7-26 18:25 
不是20%,around 11-12%
Same question as HappyMH here. I didn't know that some ESF students (be it 11-12% or 20%) are not able to sit for IBDP? May i know the reasons, and where these students end up in? (Just being curious although we ended up not choosing ESF)
作者: shadeslayer 時間: 14-8-8 08:00
ESF is the only IS in HK who offers BTEC alternatives to IBDF. this means the bottom x% of students are not affecting ESF's IBDP performance.
having said this, i don't think the difference is worth losing sleep for, and it is a good thing ESF has BTEC
作者: poonseelai 時間: 14-8-8 09:40 標題: 引用:ESF+is+the+only+IS+in+HK+who+offers+BTEC
原帖由 shadeslayer 於 14-08-08 發表
ESF is the only IS in HK who offers BTEC alternatives to IBDF. this means the bottom x% of students ...
Agree, it is good that schools provide alternatives to students. There is no point for students to pursue the IBDP if this is not their best option.

作者: himching 時間: 14-8-8 10:27
兩個女都讀不同IS, 發覺讀ESF嘅同學多黎至不同國家, 少少聯合國, 但另外果間就單一啲, 多外國回流中國人,當然都有外國人, 但就唔係黃就白, 一係蕉.
作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-8-8 10:54
回覆 hero_hero 的帖子
I don't get your point about how excellent the results of ESF is. Its IBDP results are decent but hardly best in class especially considering 10-15% of students are in BTEC.
作者: FattyDaddy 時間: 14-8-8 10:56
himching 發表於 14-8-8 10:27 
少少聯合國, 但另外果間就單一啲 ...
In my opinion, 聯合國 is good, those which are more 單一 are likely to be the country specific international schools.
作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-8-8 10:58
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
Certainly good to have alternatives. I also think the lack of BTEC in DC and RC and the higher % of bilingual diplomas probably account for their results not being as good as the overall ESF system.
作者: Shummamapapa 時間: 14-8-8 10:59 標題: 引用:回覆+shadeslayer+的帖子
Certainly+good+
原帖由 HKTHK 於 14-08-08 發表
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
Certainly good to have alternatives. I also think the lack of BTEC in DC a ...
May I know what is BTEC?

作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-8-8 11:02
回覆 Shummamapapa 的帖子
http://www.esf.edu.hk/Applied_Learning_schools
作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-8-8 11:02
回覆 FattyDaddy 的帖子
Yes, and also the schools that focuses on Chinese
作者: poonseelai 時間: 14-8-8 12:59 標題: 引用:回覆+shadeslayer+的帖子 Certainly+good+
原帖由 HKTHK 於 14-08-08 發表
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
Certainly good to have alternatives. I also think the lack of BTEC in DC a ...
Will any student do the IB certificate instead of the diploma?

作者: shadeslayer 時間: 14-8-8 13:27 標題: 引用:回覆+shadeslayer+的帖子
Certainly+good+
原帖由 HKTHK 於 14-08-08 發表
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
Certainly good to have alternatives. I also think the lack of BTEC in DC a ...
i agree they account for some of the differences. but i think the differences are too big to be explained by BTEC and bilingual diploma.

作者: HKTHK 時間: 14-8-8 13:57
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
I assume you mean DC since RC's score is pretty close. Don't forget that this is DC's first year. Will take some time to get system up and running.
作者: himching 時間: 14-8-8 18:06
FattyDaddy 發表於 14-8-8 10:56 
In my opinion, 聯合國 is good, those which are more 單一 are likely to be the country specific inter ...
可能有少少聯合國, 所以讀"ESF"個女頑皮啲, 加上ESF人多, 俾一些小朋友讀LS家長印象比較"壞".
作者: Shummamapapa 時間: 14-8-10 08:21 標題: 引用:回覆+Shummamapapa+的帖子
+http://www.es
原帖由 HKTHK 於 14-08-08 發表
回覆 Shummamapapa 的帖子
http://www.esf.edu.hk/Applied_Learning_schools
great thanks

作者: SydneyC 時間: 14-8-16 23:01 標題: 回覆:himching 的帖子
甘你另一小朋友讀邊間呀?

作者: jolalee 時間: 14-8-21 02:50
HKTHK 發表於 14-8-8 10:58 
回覆 shadeslayer 的帖子
... the lack of BTEC in DC and RC and the higher % of bilingual diplomas probably account for their results not being as good as the overall ESF system.
I agree with FattyDaddy, plus many schools with students doing bilingual diplomas (such as ISF, SIS, CIS) are scoring quite well on IB score, and they don't have BTEC either.
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |