教育王國
標題: IB 課程 [打印本頁]
作者: HH_HH 時間: 17-6-14 23:19 標題: IB 課程
小朋友今年4歲,讀緊國際學校,優點:如有興趣的事物,有好高專注力,自己去硏究發掘。缺點:唔合群,唔太懂跟人相處,硬頸。所以仲係觀察中,未知合適一讀邊種課程。
所以想請教一下,IB 課程合適什麼性格的小朋友?

作者: ratafan 時間: 17-6-15 07:33
HH_HH 發表於 17-6-14 23:19 
小朋友今年4歲,讀緊國際學校,優點:如有興趣的事物,有好高專注力,自己去硏究發掘。缺點:唔合群,唔太 ...
本帖最後由 ratafan 於 17-6-15 07:48 編輯
本帖最後由 ratafan 於 17-6-15 07:48 編輯
IB is a good curriculum in preparation for university. Students need to be all rounded, have good time management skills, good language and reasoning ability to articulate and correlate observations, knowledge and conclusions. I don't think kids are born with these skills. These are developed over time. It is too early to decide which curriculum suits a four year old. But what really matters is the choice between British vs US curriculum. E.g. For HKIS, it offers US curriculum (SAT and AP) and there's no IGCSE while in ESF, they offer igcse and IB diploma, if you want to apply for US universities you need to self study for SAT or AP. However since your child is only 4 years old, you can decide this later and switch schools in secondary.

作者: ratafan 時間: 17-6-15 07:44
HH_HH 發表於 17-6-14 23:19 
小朋友今年4歲,讀緊國際學校,優點:如有興趣的事物,有好高專注力,自己去硏究發掘。缺點:唔合群,唔太 ...
And the lack of social ability has nothing to do with curriculums. I think different curriculums do encourage kids to learn to interact and collaborate with others.

作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-20 15:21
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 17-7-20 15:35 編輯
HH_HH 發表於 17-6-14 23:19 
小朋友今年4歲,讀緊國際學校,優點:如有興趣的事物,有好高專注力,自己去硏究發掘。缺點:唔合群,唔太 ...
IB 課程原先係設計主要俾D外交官子女讀,因他們幾年就轉去另一國家,所以重點就係夠 versatile, 缺點就係太廣太淺。唔知係咪HK課程太難,抑或IB marketing 係HK做得好,近年好多學校要來做selling point. 我理解英基轉IB,因97後多了畢業生去非UK大學,那IB係方便過AL。其他學校又IB,就...........
讀乜課程要成績好, at the end of the day, 都係要識考試,唔好迷信乜課程會令到你有乜思維呀etc.
你會看到HK學生考IB成績比世界其他地方勁好多,諾貝爾學術獎又唔係拿過好多。因為HK學生考試叻。上兩三年有個中學受傳統教育既MCS畢業生去李寶春讀IB,一樣拿滿分。HK學生主要怕IB要用既英語程度唔過關,你見英基有幾十個IB狀元,同以前AL得幾個狀元,你會知道IB和AL程度差多遠,因英文不會是英基生的barrier. 有英國教授同我講,他們大學既專業學系,係 prefer AL 考生多過IB考生。
作者: HH_HH 時間: 17-7-20 15:28
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-20 15:21 
IB 課程原先係設計主要俾D外交官子女讀,因他們幾年就轉去另一國家,所以重點就係夠 versatile, 缺點就係太 ...
本帖最後由 HH_HH 於 17-7-20 15:30 編輯
小朋友大左,會安排去美國讀大學,所以趁佢細個嘅期間,想佢學好中文,耐何香港國際學校,如果中文程度有咁上下的學校,選擇不多,行AP的國際學校,中文程度一般都低。IB的學校,現在又不知是否合適她的性格,所以選擇困難
我當然知道最後都要懂得考試,有朋友的兒子在讀AP課程,相對真係讀得輕鬆好多

作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-20 15:45
HH_HH 發表於 17-7-20 15:28 
本帖最後由 HH_HH 於 17-7-20 15:30 編輯
小朋友大左,會安排去美國讀大學,所以趁佢細個嘅期間,想佢 ...
我大仔就係在HK讀AP,舊年返了美國。如去US,我個人認為AP好D,如未決定,IB又可能方便D。國際學校中文係淺,但我太太係教中文的,所以我仔女的中文又不能作準。以前他們在家,我要佢地8,9成講國語、廣東話的。
作者: Activehealth 時間: 17-7-20 19:40
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-20 15:45 
我大仔就係在HK讀AP,舊年返了美國。如去US,我個人認為AP好D,如未決定,IB又可能方便D。國際學校中文係淺 ...
好多ESF 學生學校考IB, 出面自己讀及考AP.

作者: shadeslayer 時間: 17-7-20 21:24
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-20 15:21 
IB 課程原先係設計主要俾D外交官子女讀,因他們幾年就轉去另一國家,所以重點就係夠 versatile, 缺點就係 ...
一派胡言。

作者: himching 時間: 17-7-21 11:24
.lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-20 15:21 
IB 課程原先係設計主要俾D外交官子女讀,因他們幾年就轉去另一國家,所以重點就係夠 versatile, 缺點就係 ...
"IB 課程.....缺點就係太廣太淺。"
"你會看到HK學生考IB成績比世界其他地方勁好多,諾貝爾學術獎又唔係拿過好多。"
"你見英基有幾十個IB狀元,同以前AL得幾個狀元,你會知道IB和AL程度差多遠,"
"他們大學既專業學系,係 prefer AL 考生多過IB考生。"
好強嘅邏輯 
所以大家唔好讀IB, 更加唔好再考慮讀IS, 考DSE 先係正道

作者: himching 時間: 17-7-21 12:02
HH_HH 發表於 17-6-14 23:19 
小朋友今年4歲,讀緊國際學校,優點:如有興趣的事物,有好高專注力,自己去硏究發掘。缺點:唔合群,唔太 ...
IB 課程合適什麼性格的小朋友?
多咀有主見的小朋友. 你小朋友今年得4歲, 本身此歲數應該比較自我, 性格都未定, 所謂缺點, 對佢不太公平?
反而, 佢大啲讀IB, 對你一言九頂, 你的EQ OK 嗎? 所以問題應該係 "IB 課程合適什麼性格的家長?"
週未多口啲, 不喜勿插
作者: nintendo 時間: 17-7-21 15:05
shadeslayer 發表於 17-7-20 21:24 
一派胡言。
得啖笑,我都費事回佢。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 15:59
Activehealth 發表於 17-7-20 19:40 
好多ESF 學生學校考IB, 出面自己讀及考AP.
好多IB鐵粉係接受唔到尼個實況,去美國讀係AP着數;as I said 未決定係IB方便。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 16:40
himching 發表於 17-7-21 11:24 
"IB 課程.....缺點就係太廣太淺。"
"你會看到HK學生考IB成績比世界其他地方勁好多,諾貝爾學術獎又唔係拿 ...
咁你覺得係英基突然多了幾十個尖子,抑或係IB比AL易做狀元? 你對自己忠實得架啦,唔駛答我,我冇乜興趣知。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 16:44
himching 發表於 17-7-21 11:24 
"IB 課程.....缺點就係太廣太淺。"
"你會看到HK學生考IB成績比世界其他地方勁好多,諾貝爾學術獎又唔係拿 ...
sorry, 我冇講過,考過或研究過DSE,亦不了解。
作者: nintendo 時間: 17-7-21 17:18
有位網友都好忙,local school topic 又入,IB topic 又入,
入去個個 topic ,留言都係鬧交口吻,係批評人地學校,
其實點有道理都好,也要有基本禮貌。
作者: 964000 時間: 17-7-21 17:52
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-21 16:40 
咁你覺得係英基突然多了幾十個尖子,抑或係IB比AL易做狀元? 你對自己忠實得架啦,唔駛答我,我冇乜興趣知 ...
其實Harrows 2016 年有47人考A level, 也有七個全4A*, 比例也是很高,你也可以話A level易考。

作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-21 18:20
以我所知,就係AL太容易攞A,英國大學認為唔係一個好既指標,以至越來越多學校行lB
作者: lui 時間: 17-7-21 20:22
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-21 18:20 
以我所知,就係AL太容易攞A,英國大學認為唔係一個好既指標,以至越來越多學校行lB ...
亦因為易,全a*多到牛劍収唔曬,評估唔到,所以改左制,全部一taje過。

作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 21:55
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-21 18:20 
以我所知,就係AL太容易攞A,英國大學認為唔係一個好既指標,以至越來越多學校行lB ...
英國AL係Grading 既原因,不是科程既深淺,2015年改革可能想將A*內的人可再細分。According to BBC, 英國AL俾A*大約8-10%, HKAL俾A大約4%, A-B大約10%。AL選讀學科窄而深入; IB廣而没有這麼深入。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 22:01
964000 發表於 17-7-21 17:52 
其實Harrows 2016 年有47人考A level, 也有七個全4A*, 比例也是很高,你也可以話A level易考。
...
新校冇乜往績,我真係唔知道哈羅收既學生學術水平,只知道佢地既經濟水平。要解答這問題應要垂直比較,如以後它們改考IB,就會多些 picture 。好像英基,你可垂直比較。
作者: easyparent 時間: 17-7-21 22:17
https://uni-of-oxford.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/549
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-21 22:24
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 17-7-21 22:33 編輯
nintendo 發表於 17-7-21 17:18 
有位網友都好忙,local school topic 又入,IB topic 又入,
入去個個 topic ,留言都係鬧交口吻,係批評人 ...
I am a mirror, 反影對方。有人話我好有禮貌,有人話我好冇禮貌。唔好祟拜權威,我講唔一定對,亦唔一定要信要聽,自己分析吓,亦可據事反駁,冇問題架。有D家長批評人地學校,我指出某些事件反批評,你只看我那 part , 亦都冇問題架,看者自己睇吓係咪事實。有D IB鐵粉太玻璃心,人地話相對易做狀元,數量係客觀既事實 (英基垂直比較),唔等於IB既狀元唔叻架。例如讀AP係易過IB架,我都話我仔女係讀AP架,你話考AP狀元係易過IB,有咩問題姐? 事實係AP報US大學係著數D。客觀事實就係HK DSE係主流,美國AP係主流,英國AL係主流,我亦講左好多次未選定IB就方便D。
作者: planetearth 時間: 17-7-21 23:07
easyparent 發表於 17-7-21 22:17 
https://uni-of-oxford.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/549
本帖最後由 planetearth 於 17-7-21 23:20 編輯
"In general, the IB could be considered a good grounding for candidates who are interested in multi-disciplinary humanities subjects, whereas students who wish to specialise in a particular science at Oxford may find that the concentration of three A-levels prepares them better for an intense subject-specific degree."
Thanks for the link.

作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-22 09:42
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
有AP狀元既咩?
AP本身係一個大學程度既課程
作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-22 10:30
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
容易成為狀元唔係grading問題嗎?課程就算深,但如果(舉例而已)識一半就攞A都冇用
作者: planetearth 時間: 17-7-22 11:19
planetearth 發表於 17-7-21 23:07 
本帖最後由 planetearth 於 17-7-21 23:20 編輯
"In general, the IB could be considered a good grou ...
For the kids who are interested in science.
USA University admisson expectations, believe which would be similar on other USA universities.
"Academics
A strong academic foundation in high school both improves your odds of getting into MIT and will help you make the most of the Institute when you're here. We recommend (please note that these are not "requirements") that your high school years include the following:
One year of high school physics
One year of high school chemistry
One year of high school biology
Math, through calculus
Two years of a foreign language
Four years of English
Two years of history and/or social sciences
Overall, you should try to take the most stimulating courses available to you. If your high school doesn't offer courses that challenge you, you may want to explore other options, such as local college extension or summer programs."

作者: nintendo 時間: 17-7-22 11:35
IB 太淺,淺到無論 HKU CUHK ,或外國名牌大學都比 advance standing ,比 claim credits 。所以,總之有比 advance standing 比 IB 的大學,肯定唔識嘢 ,千其唔比仔女去好讀。
IB 學生,嘻嘻哈哈又做狀元,入名大入神科,離譜。
其他學生真正又叻又有有實力,但又難做狀元,好慘。
作者: shadeslayer 時間: 17-7-22 11:36
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-21 22:24 
I am a mirror, 反影對方。有人話我好有禮貌,有人話我好冇禮貌。唔好祟拜權威,我講唔一定對,亦唔一定要 ...
It is stupid to say when Carrie Lam speaks to Long Hair, LH's behaviour is a reflection of Carrie. Then when Carrie speaks to President Xi, President Xi's demeanor is a reflection of Carrie.
Any self-respecting person would take ownership of what they say and their views. You are a mirror of yourself, no one else.

作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-22 12:49
如果有得揀,我 prefer A level,不過現實係冇得揀,除非轉校。但我並唔覺得lB比其他容易。如果真係講要攞好成績,我覺得A level更易,因為可以靠絕操練去攞高分。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:01
planetearth 發表於 17-7-21 23:07 
本帖最後由 planetearth 於 17-7-21 23:20 編輯
"In general, the IB could be considered a good grou ...
特別係UK,因大學只有三年。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:06
shadeslayer 發表於 17-7-22 11:36 
It is stupid to say when Carrie Lam speaks to Long Hair, LH's behaviour is a reflection of Carrie. ...
My feeling is mutual.
你說的 "一派胡言。" 都幾有禮貌。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:15
nintendo 發表於 17-7-22 11:35 
IB 太淺,淺到無論 HKU CUHK ,或外國名牌大學都比 advance standing ,比 claim credits 。所以,總之有比 ...
不用說服我,我不是大學收生人員。去問ANChan59 陳sir,佢又中肯又有禮貌,佢公子仲IB畢業既,佢會話你聽想入專業學系邊個著數。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:21
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-22 10:30 
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
容易成為狀元唔係grading問題嗎?課程就算深,但如果(舉例而已)識一半就攞A都冇 ...
HKAL 唔係,得4%拿A。英國本土易D,但牛劍唔笨既,一直都要面試見真章。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:24
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-22 09:42 
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
有AP狀元既咩?AP本身係一個大學程度既課程
IB和DSE都冇狀元既,人地又可安個名什麼超級狀元,狀元,榜眼咁。你鐘意啦,各自表述姐。
作者: lawsonmoon 時間: 17-7-22 16:32
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-22 12:49 
如果有得揀,我 prefer A level,不過現實係冇得揀,除非轉校。但我並唔覺得lB比其他容易。如果真係講要攞好 ...
唔評論啦,好多玻璃心。自己問吓大學收生人員,也可Google 吓D數據。但IB對寫野唔得既人絕對係難。
作者: shadeslayer 時間: 17-7-22 17:18
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-22 16:06 
My feeling is mutual.
哈,比我講中。

作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-22 18:28
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
DSE係一個每個人必考的公開試。在香港讀本地中學,如果DSE唔合格基本上可以話未完成中學課程。而DSE成績亦差唔多係衡量一個人入大學嘅唯一標準。但在美國係唔一定須要讀AP couse 或考AP試先叫中學畢業。而大學要求亦主要係 SAT(或ACT) 及中學校內成績。所以唔係每個人係都會考AP
作者: easyparent 時間: 17-7-22 18:29
planetearth 發表於 17-7-22 11:19 
For the kids who are interested in science.
USA University admisson expectations, believe which ...
In my opinion, that could be covered by IGCSE with proven public results. It then will be up to u for taking one of the mainstreams like SAT plus AP, A levels and IB. Just leave your path more flexible.
作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-22 18:32
lawsonmoon 發表於 17-7-22 16:21 
HKAL 唔係,得4%拿A。英國本土易D,但牛劍唔笨既,一直都要面試見真章。
咁即係做 A level 狀元容易啦!
作者: planetearth 時間: 17-7-22 22:00
easyparent 發表於 17-7-22 18:29 
In my opinion, that could be covered by IGCSE with proven public results. It then will be up to u f ...
There is no best school system, but a better school system for our children. I do not like spoon feeding education as "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." We chose IS or IS system school because the system matches us. We have no preference on IB, AP or A-Level, which ever matches our kid's charactor or learning style. My kid is a science guy at the current moment so looks like AP may be more flexible for him (my preference is he can take phy, chem, bio). However he has no pain in writing and doing research so he should also be fine with IB (Indeed it probably is the result of learning in an IB school)
Parents are the the one who put them on the right path, it is their own effort to walk thru.
The world now is much more dynamic than our generation, there is no absolute answer, but to keep ourselves open minded.

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-22 22:46
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-22 18:28 
回覆 lawsonmoon 的帖子
DSE係一個每個人必考的公開試。在香港讀本地中學,如果DSE唔合格基本上可以話未完 ...
You are right. Many didn't mention ap in the admission requirement .

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-22 22:48
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-22 18:32 
咁即係做 A level 狀元容易啦!
咁咪即糸個分太鬆所以易a*所以咪要改囉。

作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-23 09:36
easyparent 發表於 17-7-22 18:29 
In my opinion, that could be covered by IGCSE with proven public results. It then will be up to u f ...
美國大學主要係要完成中學課程同有SAT成績。IGCSE(同以前既會考)合格就已經係中學畢業,再加上SAT就可以去美國讀大學。我以前好多朋友都係中六未讀完就去美國讀大學。當然,美國大學亦好清楚A level 同IGCSE(會考)既分別,所以單以會考成績並不足以考到好既大學。另外個別大學可能有額外既要求,所以要睇清楚你想既大學既收生要求。
作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-23 09:44
lui 發表於 17-7-22 22:48 
咁咪即糸個分太鬆所以易a*所以咪要改囉。
你意思係而家改左唔再容易攞A* ?以我所理解係而家都好易攞A*。
作者: lui 時間: 17-7-23 09:50
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-23 09:44 
你意思係而家改左唔再容易攞A* ?以我所理解係而家都好易攞A*。
應該今年定出年才改(我意思是UK),全部As and Al 要final year 考,冇得拼貼成績,冇retake.

作者: planetearth 時間: 17-7-23 09:55
lui 發表於 17-7-23 09:50 
應該今年定出年才改(我意思是UK),全部As and Al 要final year 考,冇得拼貼成績,冇retake.
...
有考慮自己報考igcse. 改制後仍可自己報考嗎?

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-23 09:56
planetearth 發表於 17-7-23 09:55 
有考慮自己報考igcse. 改制後仍可自己報考嗎?
本帖最後由 lui 於 17-7-23 11:44 編輯
如是HkAL仍未改制,照舊
http://www.cie.org.uk/programmes-and-qualifications/cambridge-advanced/cambridge-international-as-and-a-levels/uk-changes/

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-23 10:11
planetearth 發表於 17-7-23 09:55 
有考慮自己報考igcse. 改制後仍可自己報考嗎?
You mean igcse or A level? Igcse 冇變

作者: poonseelai 時間: 17-7-23 10:33
lui 發表於 17-7-23 09:50 
應該今年定出年才改(我意思是UK),全部As and Al 要final year 考,冇得拼貼成績,冇retake.
...
之前有家長話今年生效

作者: Activehealth 時間: 17-7-23 10:53
lui 發表於 17-7-23 10:11 
You mean igcse or A level? Igcse 冇變
Sorry, IGCSE will change as well.
http://he-exams.wikia.com/wiki/Exam_Changes
IGCSE Changes
Edexcel IGCSEs are changing to a new syllabus, graded 9-1, to follow the format of new GCSEs. Cambridge International Examinations (CIE) has not announced any plans to change its IGCSEs yet, though it is offering IGCSEs in English and maths graded 9-1 alongside the traditional specifications graded A*-G.

圖片附件: myimage.jpg (17-7-23 10:53, 1.17 MB) / 下載次數 41
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=MTQ4MDk3fDYwNDc4OTNifDE3NTU4ODk5NjJ8MA%3D%3D

圖片附件: myimage.jpg (17-7-23 10:53, 882.34 KB) / 下載次數 29
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=MTQ4MTA0fDFhMDhlOWRmfDE3NTU4ODk5NjJ8MA%3D%3D

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-23 11:02
Activehealth 發表於 17-7-23 10:53 
Sorry, IGCSE will change as well.
http://he-exams.wikia.com/wiki/Exam_Changes
True. But this is for uk igcse . Hk no change

作者: Activehealth 時間: 17-7-23 11:03
poonseelai 發表於 17-7-23 10:33 
之前有家長話今年生效
唔同科分階段進行,有啲科已經改咗
有table 自己睇
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/get-the-facts-gcse-and-a-level-reform/get-the-facts-as-and-a-level-reform#timetable

圖片附件: myimage.jpg (17-7-23 11:03, 518.5 KB) / 下載次數 41
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=MTQ4MTUxfDI3ZDA5MGUyfDE3NTU4ODk5NjJ8MA%3D%3D

圖片附件: myimage.jpg (17-7-23 11:03, 567.22 KB) / 下載次數 33
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=MTQ4MTU4fDRjODgxOWVkfDE3NTU4ODk5NjJ8MA%3D%3D

作者: Activehealth 時間: 17-7-23 11:12
lui 發表於 17-7-23 11:02 
True. But this is for uk igcse . Hk no change
本帖最後由 Activehealth 於 17-7-23 11:13 編輯
You got to be kidding! You are so funny that you make me laugh...
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/tc/IPE/gce_gcse_igcse_ial/igcse/
My boy took it in HK, the certificate was issued in the U.K.
I checked the HKEAA website. They are offering the same EDEXCEL and CIE IGCSE as in in the U.K.

圖片附件: myimage.jpg (17-7-23 11:13, 134.65 KB) / 下載次數 27
/forum.php?mod=attachment&aid=MTQ4MTc1fGQxNzE4YTllfDE3NTU4ODk5NjJ8MA%3D%3D

作者: Activehealth 時間: 17-7-23 11:16
lui 發表於 17-7-23 11:02 
True. But this is for uk igcse . Hk no change
Please kindly show me the ~proof~ that IGCSE in HK is differently from the IGCSE in the UK.

作者: lui 時間: 17-7-23 11:30
Activehealth 發表於 17-7-23 11:12 
本帖最後由 Activehealth 於 17-7-23 11:13 編輯
You got to be kidding! You are so funny that you m ...
本帖最後由 lui 於 17-7-23 11:52 編輯
本帖最後由 lui 於 17-7-23 11:48 編輯
本帖最後由 lui 於 17-7-23 11:31 編輯
If I made you laugh, I shall apologise. I don't know why you have to say in this way.
I am not an expert but I do read in detail about each exam offer by each board, they have stated what the change has made toand who are affected. They have stated that the change applied to student who are in Uk but not overseas . You can check out and laugh at me again if you are right. We are parents and my kids is going take igcse in may 2018. I have checked with the school teacher as well.A level 制度改了,但Igcse 冇。咁syllabus 內容增減呢d改變每科不嬲都有。我女考既bio 同Chem 仍然用舊marking scheme .即系A*.

作者: easyparent 時間: 17-7-23 13:00
本帖最後由 easyparent 於 17-7-23 13:03 編輯
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-23 09:36 
美國大學主要係要完成中學課程同有SAT成績。IGCSE(同以前既會考)合格就已經係中學畢業,再加上SAT就可以 ...
在英制下, 學生是5 歲己入year 1, 所以一般16 歲已考GCSE, 18 歲考完A level. 港制是6 歲讀小一, 所以之前一般17 歲考會考, 19 歲考HKA level. 现在就變成18 歲考DSE.而美国一般也是18 歲完成high school. 所以之前考完會考, 讀完中六(18 歲)加SAT 就去美国讀大學. 所以英式傳統上以來中學畢業生較以前港式中七生是細一年. 所以也解釋部份原因人家之前A level 為什麼 比HK A level淺些吧. 也解釋按理, GCSE 后, 有兩年時间轉IB, A level , 或SAT.
作者: DreamKid 時間: 17-7-24 20:41
easyparent 發表於 17-7-23 13:00 
在英制下, 學生是5 歲己入year 1, 所以一般16 歲已考GCSE, 18 歲考完A level. 港制是6 歲讀小一, 所以之前 ...
我唔係好覺美國大學入學要求有年歲方面的要求。以我理解是要完成中學課程,而會考合格代表完成中學課程。有錯請指正。
返而用A level成績可以換 credit,讀少好幾科。
作者: easyparent 時間: 17-7-24 21:46
DreamKid 發表於 17-7-24 20:41 
我唔係好覺美國大學入學要求有年歲方面的要求。以我理解是要完成中學課程,而會考合格代表完成中學課程。有 ...
https://www.justlanded.com/english/United-States/USA-Guide/Education/Higher-Education
我說的是一般情况. 就如舊制下, 中大( 因已是四年制), 所以以前很多也要讀完中六, 用會考成绩入讀中大. 又如英国本土生, 如去美国讀U, 也是讀完A level 才去的. 基本不會只讀完GCSE 直去l美国大學的. A LEVEL 是有点像 AP, 個別大學是给credits 的.
作者: easyparent 時間: 17-7-24 22:01
https://www.justlanded.com/engli ... on/Higher-Education
歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |