- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-12-9
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 65
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 21-4-20
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 12
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 77
- UID
- 3377995
|
回覆 chunting34 的帖子
ISF Chinese curriculum is extremely tough and some may say unnecessarily so! There are not many schools, let alone IS, that run equally demanding Chinese curriculum that makes lateral transfer to ISF feasible. If you want your kid to be mainland level proficient in spoken and written mandarin since primary, ISF is probably the only choice.
Another key reason why students may eventually want to switch to CIS, GSIS and HKIS in more senior years is that these last 3 schools are much more established and have better channels to place students in the Ivy leagues. Despite the IB results of ISF/CIS/GSIS being quite similar, you stand a much better chance of getting into Ivy Leagues with CIS HKIS and GSIS. That said, with the US universities now running policies that are restrictive in terms of taking in students from China/HK and this situation is unlikely to ease in the foreseeable future, query the decision to bank on Ivy league admissions unless you're a US passport holder.
There are also key differences in the characters of students from CIS/HKIS/ISF and GSIS. GSIS students are generally the most academically oriented. HKIS/CIS students especially those from senior years are more loud and brash whereas ISF students are generally more modest and reserved. You notice that behavior especially at places like the AMC where you normally see congregations of these students and they behave very differently. Good and bad, depends on how you want your kid grow up to be. As a joke, if you are a Huawei user, ISF. If you are an Apple supporter, CIS and HKIS, both being very American styled institutions. GSIS for the academically strongest and has an European incline.
|
|