- 在線時間
- 8 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-3-5
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 1790
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 18-11-12
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 147
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 1937
- UID
- 3046793
|
本帖最後由 honeybunny8 於 21-1-19 23:05 編輯
回覆 DengCK 的帖子
Haha I guess you already know but are trying to confirm that we are talking about the same thing.
I get from this EK threads that "N無" refers to kids who do not check any of the boxes on the P1 application forms, like if any of the parents is an alumni or teaching staff or on the board of the school, religion, sibling is current student, etc. Some may also consider feeder kinders (e.g. SKH, BHN, CCKG for SPCCPS, DG/DB) as the "N". As far as for this discussion, seems like "N無siblings" is used to refer to younger siblings of current students who used to be in the above "N無" category, and is considered to be at a slight disadvantage when compared to siblings of current students AND with parents who are related parties.
Anyway, I usually try not to generalize or oversimplify things like childhood education, that has a lot of nuances. But from cases I know of, when the child (and the family) is right for the school, the statistics would work for that child; if the child isn't right for the school, even the best statistics / strongest connection wouldn't help.
|
|