- 在線時間
- 1 小時
- 最後登錄
- 21-9-10
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 81
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 18-1-26
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 13
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 94
- UID
- 2792164
|
本帖最後由 mtam22 於 20-12-29 13:32 編輯
Comparing ISF and Harrow is not exactly apples to apples.
My 2 cents worth, considering what ISF stands for and its unique teaching philosophy, parents should only consider ISF to VSA. Both place emphasis on mandarin so if you see your kids future as in the greater china area, ISF and VSA provides that level of language support with ISF a bit over the top in terms of mandarin focus.
Many parents want to push ISF's Chinese curriculum to Shanghai/Beijing local schools standard and the school is steadily moving towards (if not already at) that level. Hence if parents are not in a position to offer that level of mandarin support for the kids at home or if reciting Chinese poems is not "your thing", you shouldn't consider ISF. Even maths is being taught in Chinese at ISF. By the time they reach secondary school, the emphasis reverts to English with 70% of classes being taught in English. It's also around this time some kids head overseas as that's quite a solid foundation of Chinese they have at that stage.
As for English, ISF is not the strongest on English support during primary school years but you will find that most ISF kids are almost native level English speakers probably because for a lot of them that's the spoken language at home. Of the 180 or so ISF foundation year places, ISF takes in a lot of students from Victoria. Around a quarter of that non-ISF kinde intake is from Victoria. So if the kid don't speak mandarin on English at home as a first language, they'll find it very tough at ISF.
As mentioned before by other posters, ISF shouldn't be looked upon as an international school as it is not. Homework is less harsh than local schools but parents are expected to be involved. Many students have tutors in tow just like local schools. Harrow and VSA being much more IS project style based.
Hope that helps.
|
|