天神 vs Good Hope

siden

In terms of English standard, GH is definitely better than HACS. Though it's true that HACS chinese level should be a bit higher than GH.

I must say girls in GH are in general more all-rounded than HACS girls. These include girls who are also academically competent. I do not agree with your point of view. GH girls have many chances to join school teams. The school teams actively participate in various major competitions
and have many chances of performances. Unless parents of HACS deliberately create more opportunities outside school settings, girls in GH can widen their horizons better. There is no doubt about this.

However, given that HACS is a one dragon school and SMCC has better DSE results than GHS, it's pretty straightforward that one would choose HACS against GH. From my perspective, having a more secured secondary promotion prospect is much more important than english level or horizons issue.

The pressure of secondary promotion at GH is enormous.

73662710

Just compare the results of English and Chinese in dse in both colleges, smcc a bit weak in Eng but much better in Chinese compared with ghc.  And people need to bear in mind that one is a dragon school and the other tried to choose the best of the best.  Private school organize a lot of activities because parents pay for it. Studying in HA, making good use of the money saved can also widen your horizon to certain extent. SMCC is the best school in certain aspects given their non selective intake. Of course GH is also a very good school, which one to choose really depends on parents' preferred priorities.

bubuG

慳到d學費夠＄去擴闊視野。

siden

73662710 發表於 17-6-5 13:19
Just compare the results of English and Chinese in dse in both colleges, smcc a bit weak in Eng but  ...

I think we are comparing between the two primary schools.

If we are comparing between the two secondary schools, then English of GHS is slightly better than SMCC and Chinese of SMCC is MUCH better than GHS. The Chinese DSE result of GHS has been disappointing for a few years.

On the other hand, saving the school fee and spending it elsewhere after school can't widen the girls' horizon to the same extent as immersing the girls in GH primary for 6 years. This situation is similar to choosing kinder. If you choose a 學卷 kinder against St Catherine and save the school fee for Eng tutoring class after school, you won't expect the child's spoken Eng or Eng presentation skills as mature as a child who has been studying in St Catherine for 3 years.

I agree with you that SMCC has brilliant results indeed given that it doesn't have full control in selecting its students.

I personally like SMCC more than GHS.

klm402

Horsestar 發表於 17-6-3 12:58
真係估唔到咁都中乙1, 唔知點揀！

仲洗問，緊係天神

sammilcm

回覆 sissysze 的帖子

GH 都係辛苦

sammilcm

一定係天神, 一條龍上ST.MARY. GH 唔係一定收晒嫁WO.