椅底設儲物格港大生空中巴士創意賽奪冠 - 教育講場

Rank: 11


	39587

22^#

發表於 17-6-3 10:58 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 ABC-DAD 於 17-6-3 11:20 編輯

呢個網址嘅應用力學基本原理有文有路，唔難明按入

Rank: 14


	112786

23^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:02 |只看該作者

Covenant2017 發表於 17-6-3 09:58
能提出合理疑問並不需要是該科的專家，只需要見識廣博，心思細密及分析能力強就可以了 ...

Nothing to do with you.

It's my principle.

****

HK needs more positive energy for younger generation.

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11


	32340

24^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:20 |只看該作者

ANChan59 發表於 17-6-3 09:33
回覆 Covenant2017 的帖子

Fellow also by speciality, I am specialises in other discipline(s), not Ai ...

The best hope we can give to kids is to get them out of their non risk taking attitude. Start by parents allowing kids to make non-lethal mistakes.

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 14


	112786

25^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:22 |只看該作者

shadeslayer 發表於 17-6-3 11:20
The best hope we can give to kids is to get them out of their non risk taking attitude. Start by p ...

Agree.

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11


	39587

26^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:25 |只看該作者

Simple English解說aerodynamics

不過主題都唔係講呢樣嘢！

～～～
（香港用咀做創意嘅一地都係）

Rank: 11


	32340

27^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:28 |只看該作者

回覆樓主：

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-6-3 11:30 編輯

Delete.

Rank: 11


	32340

28^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:29 |只看該作者

回覆樓主:

另外唔明如何慳登機時間, 除非這新設計夠大放手提行李, 但又唔似。

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11


	39587

29^#

發表於 17-6-3 11:43 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 ABC-DAD 於 17-6-3 15:33 編輯

可能港大同學模型有點原始，不過如能憑藉概念受賞識，有機會加(入）業界精英團隊學習，亦是一件美事。

Rank: 11


	39587

30^#

發表於 17-6-3 12:58 |只看該作者

https://fmalive.honeywell.com

Today's students . Tomorrow's Scientists

akys

子爵府

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7


	12423

31^#

發表於 17-6-3 14:02 |只看該作者

Covenant2017 發表於 17-6-2 15:26
看了設計概念後，發覺是可行，也能解答我之前提出之兩個疑問（之前報導沒有說明得清楚），不過，我也要提出 ...

文中有話團隊有人喺HAECO實習，揾到空位

Rank: 11


	39587

32^#

發表於 17-6-3 14:53 |只看該作者

如何實際應用該“空間”，有其他想像空間。

Rank: 14


	112786

33^#

發表於 17-6-3 16:22 |只看該作者

本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 17-6-3 16:47 編輯

回覆 akys 的帖子

https://www.airbus-fyi.com/news/private-stowage-compartment-design-wins-airbus-fly-your-ideas-2017-competition/

https://www.airbus-fyi.com/challenges/

https://www.facebook.com/AirbusFlyYourIdeas/videos/2053806931336223/

Presentation of all teams, questions from international jury and Facebook as well

HK Team's Presentation start from 32 min to 59 min.

Introduction
DemoConstruction
Safety Requirements and compliance
Pitch the idea to commercial airlines

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 14


	112786

34^#

發表於 17-6-3 16:23 |只看該作者

akys 發表於 17-6-3 14:02
文中有話團隊有人喺HAECO實習，揾到空位

Link of the presentation at #33.

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11


	32340

35^#

發表於 17-6-3 17:42 |只看該作者

ANChan59 發表於 17-6-3 16:23
Link of the presentation at #33.

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-6-3 17:47 編輯

Thanks.

I like the design of the HK team presentation. Well rehearsed and interesting. However, i didn't even understand (much of) one of the students. And their most important slide was the one articulating the benefits. They spent only less than one minute on the benefits. And the presentation did not answer my question earlier on how they intend to save boarding time when most passengers have a larger bag than the space can store. Nearly everyone will still be using the overhead.

If the value proposition is not solid, the whole idea falls apart.

Rank: 14


	112786

36^#

發表於 17-6-3 18:36 |只看該作者

shadeslayer 發表於 17-6-3 17:42
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 17-6-3 17:47 編輯

Thanks.

Air Bus may hire them after graduation and see how they commercialise it in the future.

The simulation of time saving is based on Air Bus software and parameters, with more prototyping and work with pilot airlines, the time saving can be improved accordingly.

My observation is many passengers included myself like to put the back pack into the upper cabinet, then other passengers can't put their luggage in, they spend times to look for other spaces, the passengers behind them keep on waiting. Zoning arrangement can help but can't solve the insufficient space issues.

From their calculations, increased the storage spaces by 33%, so the queue up time at the aisle can be reduced in theory. Need more investigation and modification to validate the time saving.

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 14


	112786

37^#

發表於 17-6-3 18:56 |只看該作者

回覆樓主

我見到年青人，有創新思維，敢闖敢試，我都好開心，就算略有不足，我都會支持！

當不少成年人成日鬧年青人，不敢嘗試，沒有勇氣面對挑戰，我們會否撫心自問，我們在他們的生命中支持者，抑或是百弾齋主

God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11


	32340

38^#

發表於 17-6-3 20:51 |只看該作者

ANChan59 發表於 17-6-3 18:36
Air Bus may hire them after graduation and see how they commercialise it in the future.

The simul ...

They should probably look at the percentage of customers having small enough carry on baggage that can fit into their storage space (hence not needing the overhead) and the articulate the economic benefits of the airline on the saving of time and compare it to the cost of retrofitting all seats with this.

They can make a much more compelling case if they can relate the storage to economic return.

The British team was much better in this regard as they calculated the ROI and focus much more economic return.

The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.