- 在線時間
- 3 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-5-11
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 167
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-2-28
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 9
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 176
- UID
- 880756
|
964000 發表於 17-4-7 16:24
I read from the other post RC is offering 160 spots to ESF kids and at the end only 60 take it. So I ... Rc has 162 seats..they offered 170 to esf kindy only 60 accepted.While I think the acceptance rate is really low, she didnt mention the acceptance rate of non-esf kids. Do you think non-esf got offered of RC and 100% accepted it?
She is trying to do math tricks. There was only 162 seats in total, how could the school give out 170 offers to esf kindy alone? Are they over-offering that much? I heard many non esf kindy got offer of RC first round. I can still recall the same staff mentioned before that they DO NOT over-offer...how the math has gone wrong?
I again really think the acceptance rate is very disappointing to the school admission, but I believe non-esf kids do the same too. Why would they come up with a new policy to just punish the esf kids?
Why dont the 3 schools liaise with each other, maybe announce the result together, making the deposit deadline the same, so the parents wont be “stamp collector”...or as Fattydaddy has mentioned, just cross check with each other so that they wont be holding 2 schools or 3 at the same time.
I am sure all schools out there are facing many turn down after giving out the offers, this is how the backup thing all parents are doing, isnt it? No matter how smart your kid is, you will still apply for backup bcos you think there maybe chances he/she may fail the interview. If you are the lucky parents, you got all offer and you will have to give up the seat, so what is the big deal of having many turn down from the parents?
When PIS is not happy with that, they choose to punich esf kids, what a nice big family we are!
|
|